Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 27;63(4):543–554. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syu019

Table 4.

Correlation and regression analysis of rDNA copy number with strain features

Species Factor 1 No. of strains Factor 2 No. of levels r P
Saccharomyces paradoxus rDNA copy number 26 Geographical origin 3  − 0.287 0.293
Saccharomyces cerevisiae rDNA copy number 34 Strain group 8  − 0.253 0.240
rDNA copy number 34 Genome type 2  − 0.057 0.676
rDNA copy number 34 Modified genome type 3  − 0.037 0.896
rDNA copy number 32 Strain group 8  − 0.627 3.89 × 10−5a
rDNA copy number 32 Genome type 2 0.299 0.049
rDNA copy number 32 Modified genome type 3  − 0.129 0.006

Notes: Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) were calculated between rDNA copy number and strain features for various numbers of strains. Negative Binomial Generalised Linear Models were also fitted to the same datasets, with P-values for the resulting χ2 analysis of deviance test also found.

aFurthermore, the Negative Binomial regression indicated that the rDNA copy numbers of the Sake, Wine/European, North American and UWOPS Mosaics groups were significantly different from possessed by the Other Mosaics group, with P = 0.002, P = 1.09 × 10−5, P = 0.003, and P = 0.001 respectively.