Table 4.
Correlation and regression analysis of rDNA copy number with strain features
Species | Factor 1 | No. of strains | Factor 2 | No. of levels | r | P |
Saccharomyces paradoxus | rDNA copy number | 26 | Geographical origin | 3 | − 0.287 | 0.293 |
Saccharomyces cerevisiae | rDNA copy number | 34 | Strain group | 8 | − 0.253 | 0.240 |
rDNA copy number | 34 | Genome type | 2 | − 0.057 | 0.676 | |
rDNA copy number | 34 | Modified genome type | 3 | − 0.037 | 0.896 | |
rDNA copy number | 32 | Strain group | 8 | − 0.627 | 3.89 × 10−5a | |
rDNA copy number | 32 | Genome type | 2 | 0.299 | 0.049 | |
rDNA copy number | 32 | Modified genome type | 3 | − 0.129 | 0.006 |
Notes: Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) were calculated between rDNA copy number and strain features for various numbers of strains. Negative Binomial Generalised Linear Models were also fitted to the same datasets, with P-values for the resulting χ2 analysis of deviance test also found.
aFurthermore, the Negative Binomial regression indicated that the rDNA copy numbers of the Sake, Wine/European, North American and UWOPS Mosaics groups were significantly different from possessed by the Other Mosaics group, with P = 0.002, P = 1.09 × 10−5, P = 0.003, and P = 0.001 respectively.