Table 3. Selected lung cancer studies analysing the FGFR1 gene status in lung cancer patients using FISH technique.
| Author | Number of NSCLC analysed | Tissue technique | FGFR1 amplification (%) | FGFR1 amplification and histology | ISH probe used | Definition of FGFR1amplification | Tumour stages included in the study | Overall survival whole patient cohort | Overall survival early stage (I and II) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Weiss et al, 2010 |
153 |
TMA (two to three cores) |
22 |
only SCC analysed |
FGFR1 locus: BAC
Reference: none |
FGFR1 >9 signals |
IA, IB, IIB, IIIA, IIIB (available from n=15) |
No data |
No data |
| Heist et al, 2012 |
226 |
Whole tissue sections |
16 |
only SCC analysed |
FGFR1 locus: BAC
Reference: commercially available CEP8 |
Ratio FGFR1/CEP⩾2.2 |
IA; IB; IIA; IIB; IIIA; IIIB; IV |
No statistical difference between FGFR1-amplified and non-amplified |
No difference between FGFR1-amplified and non-amplified (n=155) |
|
Kohler et al, 2012 |
260 |
TMA (one core) |
6.5 |
10.5% SCC, 4.7% AC |
Commercially available dual-colour FISH probe |
FGFR1⩾4 signals |
T1; T2; T3; T4; N0; >N0 |
No impact |
No data |
|
Schildhaus et al, 2012 |
407 |
Whole tissue sections |
17.3 |
20% SCC and 1x ASCC and 1x LC |
Commercially available dual-colour FISH probe |
FGFR1/CEN8 ratio ⩾2.0 or average number of FGFR1 signals per tumour cell nucleus is ⩾6 or the percentage of tumour cells containing ⩾15 FGFR1 signals or large clusters in ⩾10% or the percentage of tumour cells containing ⩾5 FGFR1 signals in ⩾50% |
No data |
No impact (preliminary data) |
No data |
|
Zhang et al, 2012 |
127 |
Whole tissue sections |
8.7 |
12.5% SCC, 7% AC |
FGFR1 locus: BAC
Reference: commercially available CEP8 |
Ratio FGFR1/CEP⩾2.0 or ⩾10%gene cluster |
I, II, III, IV |
No data |
No data |
|
Craddock et al, 2013 |
121 |
TMA (three cores) |
18.2 |
only SCC analysed |
Commercially available dual-colour FISH probe |
>5 Copies of FGFR1 |
IA, IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA, IIIB, IV |
No significant difference |
No data |
|
Kim et al, 2013 |
262 |
TMA (three cores) |
13 |
Only SCC analysed |
Commercially available dual-colour FISH probe |
FGFR1 signal ⩾9 (high-level amplification) |
I; II; IIIA; IIIB |
High-level FGFR1 amplified shorter survival and DFS |
No data |
|
Tran et al, 2013 |
264 |
TMA (three to six cores) |
14 |
21.8% SCC, 20.5%LC, 5.2% AC |
Commercially available dual-colour FISH probe |
According to Schildhaus et al, 2012 |
IA, IB, IIA, IIB, III |
FGFR1-amplified tumours better prognosis |
No data |
| Current study | 329 | TMA (one core) | 12.5 | 20.7% SCC, 2.2% AC, 13% LC | Commercially available dual-colour FISH probe | FGFR1 to CEP8 signal ratio of ⩾2.0. | IA, IB, IIA, IIB | Worse OS and worse DFS | Difference between FGFR1-amlified and non-amplified tumours (n=329) |
Abbreviations: AC=adenocarcinoma; BAC=bacterial artificial chromosome; FISH=fluorescent in situ hybridisation; LC=large cell carcinoma; NSCLC=non-small cell lung carcinoma; SCC=squamous cell carcinoma; TMA=tissue microarray.