Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul;104(7):e92–e99. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301972

TABLE 1—

Baseline Characteristics of North Carolina Medicaid Enrollees in Kindergarten During 2005–2006

Variable Descriptiona Full Sample (n = 5235), % or Mean (SD) Children With Both Dentist and IMB Visits (n = 848), % or Mean (SD) Children With ≥ 2 Dentist Visits Only (n = 480), % or Mean (SD) Children With ≥ 2 IMB Visits Only (n = 3907), % or Mean (SD)
Clinical outcome variables
dmft score* 2.25 (3.28) 3.00 (3.66) 3.40 (3.98) 1.95 (3.03)
Percentage with any dmft 48.2 57.9 59.4 44.7
Proportion of dt/dmft among children with dmft* 0.39 (0.46) 0.26 (0.40) 0.15 (0.32) 0.47 (0.47)
Child-level characteristics
Number of months enrolled in Medicaid 32.3 (2.7) 32.7 (1.9) 32.7 (1.6) 32.2 (2.9)
Race
 White 38.5 36.4 34.4 39.4
 Black 41.8 42.7 42.1 41.6
Hispanic ethnicity 8.4 11.9 14.2 7
Male 51.8 53.4 50 51.6
Special health care needs 4.3 4.5 2.5 4.5
Number of well-child visits before age 3 y 4.9 (1.5) 4.9 (1.6) 4.0 (2.2) 5.0 (1.4)
Any caries-related treatments before age 3 y 10.4 31 39.2 2.4
Any oral health services received in public clinic before age 3 y 30 42.2 29.2 27.4
County-level characteristics
Medicaid eligible < 18 y per 10 000 people 493.2 (142.8) 452.8 (124.4) 417.7 (123.5) 511.2 (144.0)
Primary care providers per 10 000 people 4.1 (1.7) 4.1 (2.0) 4.5 (1.8) 4.0 (1.6)
Dentists per 10 000 people 3.5 (1.5) 3.8 (1.7) 4.6 (1.7) 3.3 (1.4)

Note. dmft = number of decayed, missing, and filled primary teeth; dt = untreated decayed teeth; IMB = Into the Mouths of Babes program. Kruskal–Wallis tests examined differences in dmft and dt/dmft among children with IMB visits, dentist visits, or both.

a

Explanatory variables included in the regression models, but not presented in this table include the rural or urban status of the child’s county of residence and the percentage of the county population with fluoridated drinking water.

*P < .001.