Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul;104(7):1294–1299. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301868

TABLE 1—

Values Used in the Markov Model Evaluating Safe Routes to School (SRTS) in New York City vs the Status Quo

Variable Base High Low
Injury risks
Increase in active transport, SRTS, % 10 12 8
Total pedestrians at risk, no.
 School-aged children (5-19 y) 40 525 . . . . . .
 Adults using intersection 181 148 . . . . . .
Annual probability of pedestrian injury, SRTS intersection
 School-aged children (5-19 y) 0.0008 0.023 0.0004
 Adults using intersection 0.002 0.014 0.0003
Risk ratio, injury, SRTS intersection
 School-aged children (5-19 y) 0.67 0.83 0.35
 Adults using intersection 0.86 0.88 0.84
Probability of hospitalization 0.12 0.16 0.08
Case fatality ratio 0.001 0.006 0.0007
Health-related quality of life,a injured 0.95 1 0.9
Cost inputs
Total program cost (NYC), $ 10 298 000 . . . . . .
Per capita program cost (NYC), $
 School-aged children (5-19 y) 254 . . . . . .
 Adults using intersection 57 . . . . . .
Injury cost, $
 Hospitalized 50 832 60 998 40 666
 Not hospitalized 1170 1404 936
 Totalb 7129 11 139 4114
Death cost, $
 Project year 1 6351 7621 5081
 At end of life/school-aged children 930 1116 744
3 y of bus transit cost, $ 2016 . . . . . .
Mean user age
School-aged children, y 10 . . . . . .
Adults using intersection, y 35 . . . . . .

Note. NYC = New York City.

a

The health-related quality of life score is scaled 0 to 1, with 1 representing perfect health.

b

Does not include lost productivity and leisure time, which is assumed to be captured in the health-related quality of life score.