Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec;13(4):1107–1116. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v13i4.35

Table 5.

Assessment of biochemical parameters as risk factors of development of diabetes and CVD

Parameters Control Case OR(95% CI) Chi2 P-Value
FBS(mmol/l) Low 83(58.9) 86(52.4) 0.9(0.6–1.5) 0.08 0.7780
*Normal 55(39.0) 61(37.2) 1
High 3(2.1) 17(10.4) 5.1(1.3–28.4) 7.33 0.0068
TC(mmol/l) Low 45(31.9) 15(9.2) 0.2(0.1–0.4) 23.68 0.0000
*Normal 95(76.4) 143(87.2) 1
High 1(0.7) 6(3.7) 4.0(0.5–185.2) 1.87 0.1710
TRIG(mmol/l) Low 0(0) 1(0.6) ------ 0.87 0.3502
*Normal 113(80.1) 129(78.7) 1
High 28(19.9) 34(20.7) 1.1(0.6–1.9) 0.05 0.8290
HDLC(mmol/l) Low 84(59.6) 71(43.3) 0.4(0.3–0.8) 10.44 0.0012
*Normal 48(34.0) 88(53.7) 1
High 9(6.4) 5(3.1) 0.3(0.1–1.1) 4.53 0.0333
LDLC(mmol/l) Low 138(97.9) 143(87.2) 0.1(0.0–0.6) 8.98 0.0027
*Normal 2(1.4) 15(9.2) 1
High 1(0.7) 6(3.7) 0.8(0.0–55.0) 0.03 0.8652
CD4(cells/ul) *Low 52(36.9) 18(11.0) 1
Normal 89(63.1) 146(89.0) 4.7(2.5–9.1) 28.77 0.0000

FBS: Fasting blood glucose; TC: Total cholesterol; TRIG: Triglycerides; HDLC: High density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDLC: Low density lipoprotein cholesterol; CD4: Cluster of differentiation 4. OR; Odd Ratio (crude), CI, Confidence Interval.

Table 5 presents the analysis for co morbidity for type II diabetes and CVD. Total cholesterol was higher in the cases than the control and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.0068). Also, LDL in the cases were nonsignificantly higher than in the controls (P=0.8652)