Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2013 Nov;17(9):3066–3080. doi: 10.1007/s10461-013-0586-x

Table 4.

Poisson and logistic GLMM to assess time by receipt of RHANI Wives intervention sessions (any sessions received) on marital safer sex practices (n = 220)

Outcome Analysis type Effect Regression coefficient Standard error Rate ratioa Lower 95 % CI Upper 95 % CI Test statisticb p value
Proportion of unprotected vaginal sex with husband, past 30 days Full model Visit (follow-up vs. baseline) 0.014 0.035 1.01 0.95 1.09 7.13 0.008
Group (any vs. no intervention sessions) −0.024 0.041 0.98 0.90 1.06 8.36 0.004
Age 0.005 0.003 1.01 1.00 1.01 2.54 0.111
Visit × group −0.190 0.061 0.83 0.73 0.93 9.75 0.002
Simple main Effects Baseline: any vs. no sessions −0.024 0.041 0.98 0.90 1.06 −0.58 0.561
Follow-up: any vs. no sessions −0.214 0.050 0.81 0.72 0.91 −3.60 0.000
No sessions: follow- up vs. baseline 0.014 0.035 1.01 0.95 1.09 0.39 0.693
Any vs. no sessions: follow-up vs. baseline −0.176 0.050 0.84 0.76 0.92 −3.53 0.000
Total number of vaginal sex acts with husband, past 30 days Full model Visit (follow-up vs. baseline) −0.218 0.601 0.80 0.24 2.64 0.43 0.511
Any sessions group (any vs. no sessions) −0.178 0.670 0.84 0.22 3.24 0.25 0.621
Age −0.058 0.041 0.94 0.87 1.03 2.02 0.166
Visit × group −0.181 0.934 0.83 0.13 5.28 0.04 0.847
Simple main effects (NA) Baseline: any vs. no sessions −0.178 0.670 0.84 0.22 3.24 −0.26 0.792
Follow-up: any vs. no sessions −0.358 0.744 0.70 0.16 3.14 −0.48 0.633
No sessions: follow- up vs. baseline −0.218 0.602 0.80 0.24 2.64 −0.36 0.718
Any sessions: follow- up vs. baseline −0.398 0.715 0.67 0.16 2.75 −0.56 0.578
Any marital condom use in the past 90 daysc Full model Visit (follow-up vs. baseline) −0.287 0.355 0.75 0.37 1.51 0.34 0.561
Any sessions group (any vs. no sessions) 0.254 0.394 1.29 0.59 2.80 3.94 0.048
Age −0.073 0.031 0.93 0.87 0.99 5.63 0.018
Visit × group 0.853 0.481 2.35 0.91 6.05 3.14 0.077
Simple main effects Baseline: any vs. no sessions 0.566 0.324 1.76 0.93 3.33 1.75 0.082
Follow-up: any vs. no sessions −0.287 0.355 0.75 0.37 1.51 −0.81 0.421
No sessions: follow- up vs. baseline 1.107 0.442 3.03 1.27 7.22 2.50 0.013
Any sessions: follow- up vs. baseline 0.254 0.394 1.29 0.59 2.80 0.65 0.519
Marital condom use at last sexc Full model Visit (follow-up vs. baseline) −0.056 0.378 0.95 0.45 1.99 5.07 0.025
Any sessions group (any vs. no sessions) −0.400 0.492 0.67 0.25 1.76 0.58 0.445
Age −0.090 0.035 0.91 0.85 0.98 6.51 0.011
Visit × group 1.370 0.559 3.94 1.31 11.83 6.00 0.015
Simple main effects Baseline: any vs. no sessions 1.315 0.413 3.72 1.65 8.38 3.19 0.002
Follow-up: any vs. no sessions −0.056 0.378 0.95 0.45 1.99 −0.15 0.883
No sessions: follow- up vs. baseline 0.971 0.440 2.64 1.11 6.27 2.21 0.028
Any sessions: follow- up vs. baseline −0.400 0.492 0.67 0.25 1.76 −0.81 0.417

Analyses were adjusted for age

Session attendance analyses

a

For the binary outcomes (i.e., any marital condom use and condom use at last sex) the corresponding estimates represent odds ratios

b

The effects in the full model were tested by type III F tests for fixed effects whereas the simple main effects were tested for the differences in least squares means by using t tests

c

For subsample of participants reporting marital sex in the past 90 days (n = 196)