Table 3.

Multivariate results (Part 2): Associations between alcohol establishment density and non-violent crime outcomes, with potential moderating effects.

	Vandalism	Nuisance	Driving while intoxicated	Public Consumption	Underage Possession/Consumption
	B [95% CI]	B [95% CI]	B [95% CI]	B [95% CI]	B [95% CI]
Alcohol establishment density	0.28 [0.19, 0.37]*	0.50 [0.31, 0.69]*	0.31 [−0.72, 1.16]	0.83 [0.49, 1.17]*	0.49 [0.25, 0.72]*
Neighborhood demographics
Population per roadway mi	0.22 [0.09, 0.35]*	0.23 [−0.02, 0.48]	0.10 [−0.11, 0.31]	0.70 [0.24, 1.21]*	−0.01 [−0.39, 0.36]
Socioeconomic/racial index	−0.26 [−0.40, −0.11]*	−0.70 [−0.90, −0.49]*	−0.26 [−0.44, −0.07]*	−0.75 [−1.19, −0.31]*	−0.33 [−0.65, 0.01]
Total population	−0.10 [−0.23, 0.04]	−0.15 [−0.40, 0.11]	−0.02 [−0.23, 0.21]	−0.29 [−0.79, 0.23]	−0.55 [−0.95, −0.13]*
Population aged 15-24	0.11 [−0.02, 0.25]	0.15 [−0.10, 0.39]	0.19 [−0.03, 0.39]	0.09 [−0.42, 0.65]	0.81 [0.43, 1.16]*
Potential moderators
Non-alcohol food retailers	--	0.32 [0.09, 0.55]*	0.21 [−0.03, 0.44]	0.26 [−0.29, 0.82]	--
Non-food retailers	--	--	--	0.27 [−0.32, 0.87]	--
Non-healthcare services	--	--	--	0.23 [−0.41, 0.79]	--
Healthcare services	--	--	−0.10 [−0.31, 0.11]	--	--
Parks in “good” condition	−0.07 [−0.16, 0.02]	--	--	--	--
Elementary schools	--	--	--	--	--
Colleges	--	0.20 [0.01, 0.39]*	−0.01 [−0.19, 0.16]	0.26 [−0.08, 0.64]	--
Neighborhood quality	--	--	−0.04 [−0.20, 0.12]	--	--
Neighborhood activism	--	--	--	0.60 [0.23, 0.99]*	0.31 [0.02, 0.60]*
Condemned buildings	0.15 [0.01, 0.30]*	--	--	--	--
Interactions
Density × Neighborhood quality	--	--	0.15 [−0.07, 0.41]	--	--
Density × Healthcare services	--	--	−0.09 [−0.26, 0.07]	--	--
Density × Colleges	--	−0.77 [−1.38, −0.20]*	−0.52 [−1.05, 0.03]	−1.32 [−2.58, −0.07]*	--

^*p < 0.05.

Note: -- indicates variable not included in multivariate model because it was not significant in individual moderator model. All variables included in multivariate model were retained, regardless of significance