Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Lang. 2014 Jan 24;129:7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.11.005

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

FaceFont and FaceSyllable phonogram learning. AA1 was able to learn the initial set of five FaceFont phonograms (Set A) but not the second set (Set B). (a1) AA1's average accuracy across all FaceFontA recall attempts was only 0.22 SDs below the control mean, but her average accuracy across all FaceFontB recall attempts was 5.3 SDs below the control mean. (a2) In the FaceFont protocol, AA1 reached the early advancement criterion for FaceFontA (100% accuracy on two consecutive recall attempts). In contrast, for FaceFontB she reached the maximum recall attempts allowed without scoring above an 80.00%. AA1 was able to learn all three sets of five FaceSyllable phonograms. (b1) AA1's average accuracy across all recall attempts for each FaceSyllable set was 0.46 SDs below (FaceSyllableA), 0.02 SDs above (FaceSyllableB), and 6.51 SDs below (FaceSyllableC) the control mean. (b2) In contrast with the FaceFont protocol, AA1 reached 100.00% accuracy on all three FaceSyllable sets after nine or fewer recall attempts. Error bars in (a1, b1) represent standard deviations.