Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 16.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Linguist Phon. 2005 Jun;19(4):335–359. doi: 10.1080/02699200500085426

Table IV.

Between-system and between-transcriber agreement in phonetic transcriptions using analog and digital audio systems.

Data Set Between-System Agreement
Between-Transcriber Agreement
Trans. 1 Trans. 2 Cohen’s
d
Confidence Interval
Effect Size Analog Digital Cohen’s
d
Confidence Interval Descriptor
Lower Upper Lower Upper
No. of transcripts 8 4 4 4
No. of utterances 977 484 484 484
No. of possible words 2713 1404 1404 1404
No. of words used 1690 833 825 815
Point-by-point Agreement (%) Vowels
Broad transcription 90.3 (2.1)a 94.9 (1.5) −2.19*b −3.94 −.44 Extremely Largec 86.5 (3.5) 85.4 (4.0) .25 −1.14 1.65 Small
Narrow transcription 83.4 (3.8) 90.9 (1.7) −2.21* −3.97 −.45 Extremely Large 80.3 (4.8) 78.2 (4.3) .40 −1.00 1.80 Small
Consonants
Broad transcription 88.6 (3.6) 93.0 (2.3) −1.27 −2.78 .25 Very Large 76.1 (9.8) 78.1 (6.5) −.21 −1.60 1.18 Small
Narrow transcription 83.5 (3.2) 88.1 (4.8) −.98 −2.45 .49 Large 69.1 (10.6) 71.5 (7.3) −.23 −1.62 1.16 Small
a

Standard deviations for the mean agreement percentages are enclosed in parentheses.

b

Significant effect sizes (p<.05) are indicated by an asterisk.

c

See text for key to effect size descriptors.