Becker 2009.
Methods | Open label extension study (3 years findings). No of patients randomised =1280 subjects who previously completed one of the 2 Phase III double‐blind trials (Becker 2005a; Schumacher 2008). No. of patients completing the study = 1086. No. of patients analysed for harms and gout flares = 664 |
|
Participants | Inclusion criteria: preliminary criteria of the ACR for gout. Exclusion criteria: pregnancy or lactation; serious drug‐related AE in the prior study; other significant medical conditions that would interfere with treatment harms or compliance; or known intolerance to allopurinol.. Location: 174 centres in the USA and Canada. |
|
Interventions | 3 groups: 1. Febuxostat 80 mg/day N = 606 2. Febuxostat 120 mg/day N = 388 3.Allopurinol N = 92 During the first six months of treatment, subjects could switch their febuxostat doses if necessary. Subsequent gout flares treated at the investigators' discretion. |
|
Outcomes |
The primary efficacy endpoint: ‐ serum uric acid < 6.0 mg/dL at each visit. Secondary efficacy endpoints: ‐ proportion of subjects with serum uric acid < 6.0 mg/dL at each visit. ‐ percentage reduction from baseline in the serum uric acid concentration at each visit. ‐ incidence of gout flares. ‐ reduction in number of tophi ‐ reduction in the size or disappearance of the index tophus Adverse events. |
|
Notes | Source of funding: TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Open label extension from FACT and APEX studies |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Open label extension from FACT and APEX studies |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open label extension study |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Efficacy analyses were based on a modified intention‐to‐treat population (only those that received treatment). There is no description on how incomplete outcome data was analysed |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | The study protocol is not available, but the authors did not report on 5 of the 9 outcomes recommended by OMERACT(OMERACT 9). |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Source of funding: TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. |