Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 16.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;4:CD009148. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009148.pub2
Methods Randomised controlled trial.
Participants Outpatients referred for fetal heart monitoring.
Interventions Visual or computerised interpretation of FHR monitoring recording
Outcomes Number of additional fetal surveillance tests, amount of time spent per FHR test, perinatal morbidity and mortality, NICU admission for more than 2 days, and total NICU days. Perinatal morbidity was defined as caesarean delivery for fetal distress, hypocalcaemia (total serum calcium level < 7 mg/dL), hyperbilirubinaemia (indirect bilirubin level > 12 mg/dL), hypoglycaemia (glucose serum level < 30 mg/dL), respiratory distress syndrome, transient tachypnoea, and meconium aspiration
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors’ judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random number table.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Opaque envelopes.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes
High risk Not blinded.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes
High risk Not blinded.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes
Low risk Five pregnancies were excluded from the outcome analysis because infants were diagnosed with congenital anomalies: four of these appear to be from the visual interpretation group (n=201) and one from the computerised interpretation group (n=204)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All prespecified outcomes appear to have been reported upon.
Other bias Low risk “The two randomized groups were similar at baseline, but the computerized interpretation group has significantly fewer biophysical profiles compared with the visual interpretation group”