Methods | Randomised. | |
Participants | 172 pregnant women with at least 34 weeks’ gestation and with no contraindications to contraction stress test | |
Interventions | Non-stress test versus fetal acoustic stimulation. | |
Outcomes | Mode of delivery, Apgar scores, perinatal deaths, time to perform the test, abnormal test | |
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors’ judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Randomised by draw of sealed envelopes. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Sealed envelopes. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes |
High risk | Not blinded. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes |
High risk | Not blinded. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes |
Unclear risk | Unclear - does not report any withdrawals, but not enough information to tell if results are based on the whole sample randomised |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Unclear - not clearly documented which outcomes were to be collected as part of the study |
Other bias | Low risk | “These two groups were comparable for maternal ages, parities, gestational ages, modes of delivery, and Apgar scores.” |