Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 16.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;4:CD009148. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009148.pub2
Methods Randomised.
Participants 172 pregnant women with at least 34 weeks’ gestation and with no contraindications to contraction stress test
Interventions Non-stress test versus fetal acoustic stimulation.
Outcomes Mode of delivery, Apgar scores, perinatal deaths, time to perform the test, abnormal test
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors’ judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomised by draw of sealed envelopes.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sealed envelopes.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes
High risk Not blinded.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes
High risk Not blinded.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes
Unclear risk Unclear - does not report any withdrawals, but not enough information to tell if results are based on the whole sample randomised
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Unclear - not clearly documented which outcomes were to be collected as part of the study
Other bias Low risk “These two groups were comparable for maternal ages, parities, gestational ages, modes of delivery, and Apgar scores.”