Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 16.
Published in final edited form as: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Apr 18;4:CD009148. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009148.pub2
Methods Randomised.
Participants 897 patients presenting for antenatal fetal monitoring.
Interventions Non-stress test compared with FAS test (monitoring for 5 minutes)
Outcomes Number of reactive tests, number of stimuli needed to achieve reactive test, antenatal fetal death
Notes
Risk of bias
Bias Authors’ judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation by lottery.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) High risk None.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes
High risk None.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes
High risk None.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes
Unclear risk Unclear from tables whether data from all participants included in the analyses
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes appear to have been reported upon.
Other bias Unclear risk No baseline characteristics table - mean parity of each group was similar