Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 11;30(12):i255–i263. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu264

Table 2.

The comparison results about memory consumption of our parallel against original versions of A* search for protein design

PDB Space A*1 GA*768 GA*4992
2QCP 2·1017 31 589 690 32 825 074 35 517 854
1XMK 2·1014 2 910 324 3 325 654 4 419 100
1X6I 7·1013 1 919 055 2 282 986 3 486 684
1UCS 6·1012 1 713 636 2 196 315 2 960 752
1CC8 3·1014 966 196 1 255 899 1 893 701
2CS7 8·1012 1 378 633 1 686 558 2 354 910
2BWF 9·1013 325 634 529 810 981 302
1I27 7·1011 121 920 260 825 737 328
1T8K 2·1013 129 767 211 003 618 794
1R6J 2·1014 117 053 244 399 837 359

Note: Each column has the same meaning as that in Table 1 except that the numbers in last three columns represent the numbers of expanded nodes in different programs.