Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 7;3:58. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-3-58

Table 1.

The results of reporting quality assessment (n = 487)

PRISMA items
Yes
Partial
No
    n (%) 95% CI n (%) 95% CI n (%) 95% CI
Title
1. Title
476 (98)
96–99
1 (0)
1–1
10 (2)
1–4
Abstract
2. Structured summary
256 (53)
48–57
226 (46)
42–51
5 (1)
0–2
Introduction
3. Rational
429 (88)
85–91
55 (11)
9–14
3 (1)
0–2
4. Objective
335 (69)
65–73
143 (29)
26–34
9 (2)
1–4
Methods
5. Protocol and registration
2 (0)
0–2
58 (12)
9–15
427 (88)
85–90
6. Eligibility criteria
447 (92)
89–94
39 (8)
6–11
1 (0)
1–1
7. Information sources
480 (99)
97–100
6 (1)
0–23
1 (0)
0–1
8. Search
263 (54)
50–59
182 (37)
33–41
42 (9)
6–12
9. Study selection
241 (50)
45–54
72 (15)
12–18
174 (36)
32–40
10. Data collection process
334 (69)
64–73
45 (9)
7–12
108 (22)
19–26
11. Data items
203 (42)
37–46
25 (5)
4–8
259 (53)
49–58
12. Risk of bias in individual studies
436 (90)
87–92
17 (4)
2–6
34 (7)
5–10
13. Summary measures
444 (91)
88–93
7 (1)
0–3
36 (7)
5–10
14. Synthesis of results
453 (93)
90–95
7 (1)
0–3
27 (6)
4–8
15. Risk of bias across studies
161 (33)
29–37
74 (15)
12–19
252 (52)
47–56
16. Additional analyses
253 (52)
48–56
44 (9)
7–12
190 (39)
35–43
Results
17. Study selection
356 (73)
69–77
70 (14)
12–18
61 (13)
10–16
18. Study characteristics
445 (91)
89–94
21 (4)
3–7
21 (4)
3–7
19. Risk of bias with studies
423 (87)
84–90
31 (6)
5–9
33 (7)
5–9
20. Results of individual studies
442 (91)
88–93
24 (5)
3–7
21 (4)
3–7
21. Synthesis of results
442 (91)
88–93
23 (5)
3–7
22 (5)
3–7
22. Risk of bias across studies
109 (22)
19–26
94 (19)
16–23
284 (58)
54–63
23. Additional analyses
142 (29)
25–33
56 (11)
9–15
289 (59)
55–64
Discussion
24. Summary of evidence
440 (90)
87–93
38 (8)
6–11
9 (2)
1–4
25. Limitations
385 (79)
75–83
42 (9)
6–12
60 (12)
10–16
26. Conclusions
394 (81)
77–84
85 (18)
14–21
8 (2)
0–3
Funding
27. Funding
119 (24)
21–28
41 (8)
6–11
327 (67)
63–71
Total score
Scope
8.5–26.0
  ±SD 19.60 ± 3.33