Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 25;4(4):717–731. doi: 10.1534/g3.113.009597

Table 4. SVs distinguishing donor from recipient—Filtering and cross-validation.

Class All SVsa/Filtered SVsb Transforming SVs (≥1)c
Deletesd Insertse Totalf Deletesd Insertse Totalf
1 bp 277 / 166 318 / 203 595 / 369 43 46 89
2−10 bp 192 / 154 180 / 148 369 / 300 33 29 61
11−100 bp 53 / 34 63 / 51 95 / 68 5 12 14
101−1000 bp 39 / 33 34 / 30 90 / 73 4 5 12
>1000 bp 23 / 21 30 / 18 62 / 48 5 4 10
Complexg 10 0
Total 584 / 408 625 / 450 1221 / 868 90 96 186

SVs, structural variants; IGV, Integrative Genomics Viewer.

a

Total SVs from a Mauve alignment. Indel directionality is relative to transformation, such that insertions are donor-specific and deletions are recipient-specific. Reporting indels is complicated by “insertional deletions,” where donor sequences would replace recipient sequences (17% of filtered SVs), a pattern more common for large SVs (44% affecting >100 bp), so net change is reported.

b

Subset of indels for which reads distinguished donor from recipient and <5% of genotypes were ambiguous.

c

Subset of SVs with the donor allele present in ≥1 of the 72 selected clones.

d

SVs with indicated number of bps would be deleted by transformation; the net deletion (i.e., the donor allele was shorter than the recipient allele).

e

SVs with indicated number of bps would be inserted by transformation; the net insertion (i.e., the donor allele was longer than the recipient allele).

f

SVs affecting the indicated number of bps; sum of donor and recipient allele lengths.

g

Complex SVs (inversions, relocations, etc.) missed by the genotyping method but manually inspected using IGV.