Table V.

Univariate analysis of predictors of RS and abnormal anatomic results in patients who had no adhesion barrier during hysteroscopic metroplasty^a and group-adjusted models^b.

Parameter	Criteria	Predictors	No antiadhesion
			Odds ratio	95% Confidence interval	P
RS	ESHRE-ESGE	Width	3.2	1.7–6.5	<0.01
		Surface area	1.3	1.0–1.8	0.07
	ASRM > 1 cm	Width	9.7	2.4–21.0	0.02
		Surface area	1.8	1.2–3.3	0.02
Group-adjusted models for RSc,d	ESHRE-ESGE	Width	2.0	1.3–3.1	<0.01
		Group	0.30	0.14–0.60	<0.01
		Surface area	1.2	0.9–1.5	0.18
		Group	0.33	0.16–0.63	<0.01
Abnormal anatomic resultse	ESHRE-ESGE	Width	3.4	1.8–6.9	<0.01
		Surface area	1.4	1.0–1.9	0.04
	ASRM > 1 cm	Width	3.1	1.6–6.7	<0.01
		Surface area	1.7	1.2–2.6	<0.01
Group-adjusted models for abnormal anatomic results	ESHRE-ESGE	Width	2.2	1.5–3.5	<0.01
		Group	0.26	0.12–0.55	<0.01
		Surface area	1.2	1.0–1.5	0.10
		Group	0.31	0.16–0.57	<0.01
	ASRM > 1 cm	Width	3.5	1.9–7.5	<0.01
		Group	0.22	0.07–0.55	<0.01
		Surface area	1.5	1.2–2.1	<0.01
		Group	0.32	0.13–0.69	<0.01

ASRM, American Society of Reproductive Medicine; ESHRE-ESGE, European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology—European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy.

^aN = 49 patients; ^bN = 96 patients.

^cRatio between no adhesion barrier to autocross-linked polysaccharide group.

^dModels adjusted by group for RS with the ASRM > 1 cm criterion could not be performed because no patient in the autocross-linked polysaccharide group had an RS > 1 cm.

^eRS or/and intrauterine adhesions in other locations.