Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 16.
Published in final edited form as: Curr HIV Res. 2013 Oct;11(7):549–558. doi: 10.2174/1570162x12666140129105726

Table 3.

Moderators of delay in sexual intercourse and condom use at last assessment.

Delay in Sex Condom Use
β P β P
Sample Characteristics
 Young women (%) .064 .479 .046 .719
 Alcohol use, % at baseline .996 .000 .292 .566
 Multiple partners, % at baseline NA NA .463 .003
 PVA, % at baseline NA NA .406 .002

Intervention Facilitators and Dose
 Facilitators (no.) .768 .000 .499 .001
 Paraprofessional (vs. others) .513 .000 .310 .016
 Sessions (no.) −.095 .316 .545 .000
 Intervention dose (total) .242 .011 .543 .000

Intervention Components
 Social norms .428 .000 −.172 .182
 Skills, condom use .513 .000 .300 .020
 Gender inequalities .315 .001 .345 .007
 Alcohol education/risks .345 .000 .345 .007

Note. Fixed-effects regression models used the inverse of the variance for each effect size as weights. Reported coefficients (β) are standardized. Bold typeface values are significant; values underlined are significant after adjusting the p-value for the number of statistical tests performed (Bonferroni; delay in sex: P < .005; condom use: P < .004). NA, not applicable.