Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 16.
Published in final edited form as: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Nov 1;1827(3):365–386. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.10.012

Table 1.

Partial processes and kinetic parameters for Qo-site model

Reaction equation Rate constants kforward kreverse Keq
EFeS.c1.bL.bH + QH2 Ý EFeS.c1.bL.bH .QH2 konQH koff 500×[QH2] 5×103 10 a
EFeS.c1.bL.bH .QH2 Ý EFeS.c1.bL.bH .QH-H kproton k−proton 107 1012 10−5 b
EFeS.c1.bL.bH .QH-H Ý EFeS.c1.bL.bH .SQ(d) k1 k−1 1.65×108 3.25×105 510 c
EFeS.c1.bL.bH .SQ(d) Ý EFeS.c1.bL.bH .SQ(d) k5 k−5 108 3×108 0.33 d
EFeS.c1.bL.bH .SQ(d) + Aox Ý EFeS.c1.bL.bH .SQ(d) + Ared k3 k−3 107 105 100 e
EFeS.c1.bL.bH .SQ(d) Ý EFeS.c1.bL.bH .Q(d) k2d k−2d 1.2×103 0.192 6250 f
EFeS.c1.bL.bH .Q(d) Ý EFeS.c1.bL.bH .Q(d) k4 k−4 106 6250 160 g
EFeS.c1.bL.bH .SQ(d) Ý EFeS.c1.bL.bH .SQ(p) kdiff k−diff 107 107 1 h
EFeS.c1.b L.bH .SQ(d) Ý EFeS.c1.b L.bH .SQ(p) kdiff3 k−diff3 106 108 0.01 h
EFeS.c1.bL.bH .SQ(p) Ý EFeS.c1.bL.bH .Q(p) k2p k−2p 4.3×109 6.9×105 6250 i
EFeS.c1.bL.bH .Q(p) Ý EFeS.c1.bL.bH .Q(p) k4 k−4 106 6250 160 g
EFeS.c1.bL.bH .Q(p) Ý EFeS.c1.bL.bH .Q(d) kdiff k−diff 107 107 1 h
EFeS.c1.bL.bH .Q(d) Ý EFeS.c1.bL.bH + Q koff konQ 5×103 50×[Q] 1 j
EFeS.c1.bL.bH + QH2 Ý EFeS.c1.bL.bH.QH2 koff konQH 500×[QH2] 5×103 10 k

Notes:

The model represents the essential processes of the Qo-site reaction, constrained by antimycin to prevent the Qi-site reaction so that flux out of the b-heme chain is inhibited. The full complement of redox centers is included, and an additional acceptor (by default in 6-fold excess over the complex) of Em,7 420 mV to simulate the driving force available from the rest of the chain. For simplicity, it is assumed that all components retain the Em,7 values determined by redox titration. The reactions shown are appropriate to the first turnover of the Qo-site. The model allows simulation of the second turnover, and uses the same rate constants for similar processes (see Supplementary Information for details).

a)

The value for konQH shown is that suggested in [ 31], with the initial [QH2] given as 200 (no units), to give an apparent first-order rate constant of 5×104 s−1. In chromatophores at saturating QH2, the exchange of Q and QH2 has no appreciable contribution to the kinetics [72], indicating that these reactions are all rapid compared to the rate limiting step. The second-order rate constant determined in situ was ~2 × 105 M−1s−1 [74], estimated from the observed rate at ~10 mM QH2 in the membrane. The diffusion-limited rate constant would be considerably higher. The displacement of the apparent Em due to formation of the ES1-complex shows a tighter binding of QH2 than Q by a factor ~10.

b)

Rates for H+ exchange along H-bonds have been variously estimated on the range 1011 to 1013s−1 [123125]. We have used a value of 1012 s−1 for k−proton, the more rapid of the two rate constants, but any choice in the range shown experimentally would give the same kinetics overall. The ratio of rate constants gives the probability for finding the H+ in a position favorable for electron transfer (the equilibrium constant for distribution along the H-bond), derived from the difference in pK values between donor (the −OH of QH2, pK >11.5) and acceptor groups (the Nε of His-152 (His-161 in mitochondrial sequences) of the oxidized ISP, with pKox1 ~7.6). At saturating QH2, electron transfer occurs from the ES1-complex, and the value for pKox1 would be less than in the isolated ISP because of the binding free-energy [8]. A value of 6.5 is used in the simulation (a ΔpK of 105).

c)

The forward rate constant is that for electron transfer from the weakly populated configuration in which the H+ is close to the histidine Nε of His-152 (occupancy 10−5 used here, see (b)). The value for rate constant needed is therefore 105-fold greater than the observed value. The value given here is that from a Marcus analysis using the distance dependence of Moser and colleagues [100], and λ = 0.935, distance 7.0 Å, and driving force ΔGo/F = −0.16 V appropriate to the value for Keq shown. The reverse rate constant is chosen to give a SQ occupancy in the range shown by experiment (~0.05 [30] and this work), after taking account of the occupancy of the intermediate state. It is assumed that the reaction is reversible only in the ES1-complex configuration. After electron transfer, the H-bond to SQ would break, releasing the reduced ISP, which would rapidly rotate away from the ES-complex configuration to passes its electron to heme c1.

d)

Removal of ISPH from interaction with Qo-site, and oxidation to ISPox. The forward rate constant given is that for dissociation and movement of ISPH, since this would release SQ for further reaction. The equilibrium constant is that for oxidation of ISPH by cyt c1, which is weakly unfavorable at pH 7.0.

e)

Second-order rate constant to represent oxidation of cyt c1 by a pool of high-potential acceptor.

f)

The forward rate constant for oxidation of SQ in the domain distal from heme bL. The value is that needed to match the observed rate in strains mutated at Glu-295 (v~40–80 QH2/bc1/s at pH 8.5 – 9), with a SQ occupancy ~0.05 [30], using the relation, v = k(occupancy).

g)

The rate constant for electron transfer from heme bL to heme bH. The forward rate constant was calculated using Marcus/Moser-Dutton analysis from the distance given by modeling. The reverse rate constant was chosen so that the equilibrium constant matches that calculated from Em values. The value is similar to that determined from the rate of oxidation of heme bH induced by generation of a membrane potential [126]. The kinetics of heme bH reduction were not significantly changed by varying the value for k4 over the range 104 to 106 s−1, though a transient reduction of heme bL (maximal occupancy 0.08) was seen when the lower value was used.

h)

An approximate value for kdiff is given by k ≈ 1/t = 2D /<x2>. Using x = 5×10−8 cm, D in the range 10−9 to 10−7 cm2 s−1 [119, 120], we find 0.8× 106 <kdiff <0.8 × 108 s−1, assuming a 1- dimensional diffusion path, and diffusion in both directions from a starting position; if movement was constrained to the direction closer to heme bL, the values would scale up. The value used in the simulation could be varied over the range 108 – 107 s−1 without changing the overall rate of reaction. In all the simulations shown in which heme bL was available in the oxidized form, the same value was used in forward and reverse directions. The limited range could be extended by applying a bias to the diffusional process. For example, bias would increase kdiff if there was a coulombic driving force for displacement of Q.- by a positive field around heme bL. Similarly, the occupancy of the distal domain by Q.- could be constrained if k−diff was increased by a negative field around ferroheme bL. In the simulation, we implemented such an effect under conditions in which both b-hemes were reduced, but the only outcome affected was the distribution between SQd and SQp states. In the mechanism outlined in Fig. 8 we speculate that the change in charge on reduction would switch the field from +ve to −ve, but have not otherwise implemented that feature in the present models. For the neutral Q species, the same value for kdiff was used in both reaction directions. The value for kdiff was varied in the plots of Figs. 79, as indicated, to simulate impaired oxidation of SQ by mutation of Glu-295.

i)

The forward rate constant for oxidation of SQ in the domain proximal to heme bL. The value was calculated using the Moser-Dutton distance parameter, the distance to heme bL shown by myxothiazol-containing structures, and the Marcus exponential term [8]. Both here, and in estimation of the complementary parameter for the distal domain, the reverse rate constant was calculated so as to be consistent with the equilibrium for the overall reaction and the other values for equilibrium constants used in the simulation.

j)

The values chosen reflect a 10-fold tighter binding for QH2 than Q at the catalytic site. As noted in a), the actual value is conservative.

k)

Because of the 25 Å distance, and the neutral charged state of the binding species, it was assumed that the redox state of heme bH did not affect the binding of Q or QH2 at the Qo-site.