Skip to main content
. 2014 May 22;15:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-15-60

Table 2.

QTL for gray leaf spot (GLS) resistance and days to anthesis (DTA) identified in the CML444 X SC Malawi RIL population$

Chr a Bin b Peak marker c 1-LOD interval d 2-LOD interval e LOD Score f R 2 g Additive effect h Allele source i QTL name j
1
1.10
umc147b
264.7 - 281.0
264.3 - 285.7
3.39
10.1
-0.460
CML
1C_GLS
1
1.10
umc147b
270.9 - 285.6
267.5 - 289.7
3.23
6.4
-0.278
CML
1G_GLS
3
3.02/3.03
bnlg1447
29.6 - 46.2
25.3 - 50.1
2.95
8.5
-0.409
CML
3H_GLS
3
3.09
bnlg1182
201.8 - 219.6
207.9 - 219.6
4.55
13.0
-0.472
CML
3F_GLS
4
4.01
umc1017
0.0 - 8.2
0.0 - 13.3
3.14
8.0
-0.252
CML
4K_GLS
4
4.08
umc15a
121.9 - 133.8
116.5 - 136.6
4.78
10.9
-0.364
CML
4G_GLS
4
4.08
umc15a
122.6 - 132.9
120.9 - 136.0
4.55
12.8
-0.551
CML
4E_GLS
4
4.08
umc15a
122.9 - 136.1
120.4 - 140.5
3.59
8.9
-0.336
CML
4B_GLS
4
4.08
csu11b
127.9 - 139.3
127.9 - 142.3
3.92
12.0
-0.497
CML
4J_GLS
6
6.06
umc1424
141.0 - 151.7
135.3 - 154.7
4.92
21.8
0.626
SC
6F_GLS
6
6.06/6.07
umc36
142.7 - 160.5
139.2 - 164.3
3.29
13.0
0.504
SC
6H_GLS
6
6.06/6.07
umc36
142.3 - 161.4
139.0 - 162.3
2.95
13.8
0.335
SC
6K_GLS
6
6.06/6.07
umc36
147.3 - 166.1
143.7 - 174.0
3.64
13.7
0.584
SC
6E_GLS
6
6.06/6.07
umc36
147.5 - 162.1
143.1 - 169.6
5.00
10.2
0.362
SC
6G_GLS
6
6.06/6.07
umc36
150.7 - 162.0
147.7 - 168.5
4.61
10.7
0.232
SC
6I_GLS
6
6.06/6.07
umc36
148.3 - 163.9
143.2 - 174.4
3.38
9.3
0.451
SC
6J_GLS
7
7.02
umc1393
10.0 - 28.7
9.0 - 30.7
3.16
10.2
0.467
SC
7C_GLS
7
7.02
umc1393
20.4 - 29.7
20.1 - 30.8
3.31
10.4
0.218
SC
7I_GLS
7
7.02/7.03
bnlg1808
22.1 - 36.5
20.4 - 40.5
3.00
9.0
0.273
SC
7K_GLS
7
7.02/7.03
bnlg1808
34.4 - 41.1
33.0 - 43.0
4.67
13.4
0.341
SC
7A_GLS
7
7.02/7.03
bnl15.21
30.8 - 42.8
30.8 - 44.6
3.16
9.4
0.446
SC
7J_GLS
7
7.04
bnl14.07
72.2 - 86.3
67.2 - 87.4
3.26
10.0
0.425
SC
7F_GLS
9
9.04/9.05
umc1231
83.0 - 97.3
75.6 - 97.6
3.31
10.7
-0.317
CML
9A1_GLS
9
9.04/9.05
umc1231
92.9 - 101.3
77.8 - 105.5
3.70
9.2
-0.435
CML
9F1_GLS
9
9.06
umc1733
115.0 - 122.8
110.7 - 124.5
3.40
7.6
0.398
SC
9H_GLS
9
9.06
umc1733
119.8 - 123.6
119.8 - 124.7
4.51
10.1
0.482
SC
9F2_GLS
9
9.06
umc1733
120.3 - 123.6
120.0 - 124.4
6.65
17.8
0.443
SC
9A2_GLS
10
10.2
umc1337
23.4 - 40.5
16.6 - 45.5
2.99
6.3
-0.283
CML
10G1_GLS
10
10.06/10.07
bnl7.49a
114.0 - 127.9
110.9 - 129.8
4.53
13.5
-0.509
CML
10H_GLS
10
10.06/10.07
bnl7.49a
113.4 - 129.2
108.7 - 129.9
4.52
12.5
-0.391
CML
10G2_GLS
4
4.08
umc15a
122.3 - 134.4
120.4 - 138.0
3.90
10.6
-0.275
CML
4_GLS*
6
6.06/6.07
umc36
148.8 - 161.4
146.2 - 167.2
6.09
20.9
0.392
SC
6_GLS*
1
1.07
dupssr12
189.7 - 202.0
187.5 - 217.2
4.73
14
1.1399
SC
1_DTA#
4 4.09 npi593a 141.6 - 149.8 138.0 - 153.1 4.04 10 0.9455 SC 4_DTA#

aMaize chromosome.

bChromosome bin location of QTL (1-LOD (i.e. 95% confidence) interval) based on shared markers with the IBM2005 neighbours frame map.

cPeak marker refers to marker on QMap 2.0 that is closest to the QTL peak.

dRange in cM that defines 1-LOD interval of QTL.

eRange in cM that defines 2-LOD interval of QTL.

fLog of odds (LOD) value at position of QTL peak.

gPhenotypic variance explained by the QTL (expressed as percentage).

hAdditive effect of QTL. For GLS disease ratings, this is based on the one to nine scale employed. For days to anthesis, this is based on days. Positive values indicate that the allele for resistance or early anthesis was derived from SC Malawi.

iParental allele associated with increased GLS resistance or earlier anthesis CML = CML444; SC = SC Malawi.

jQTL name. First number indicates maize chromosome number whereas letter denotes field trial as described in Figure 1. Subsequent numbers differentiate more than one QTL identified on the same chromosme in the same field trial. GLS represent QTL for GLS resistance whereas DTA indicate QTL for days to anthesis.

*Joint GLS QTL calculated from the mean z-scores of the least square means of the GLS disease scores from the eleven environments.

#DTA QTL were identified using DTA data from an independent field trial at Redgates 2010.

$GLS QTL were identified using QMap2.0 and GLS disease data from each of eleven environments in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. DTA QTL were identified using QMap2.0 and DTA data from an independent field trial at Redgates farm, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.