Skip to main content
. 2014 May 30;16(5):e143. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3163

Table 3.

Follow-up well-being of adolescents who were at risk of mental health problems at baseline and the effects of the interventions on well-being, with the control group as reference (n=194).

Well-being Adolescents at risk of mental health problems, mean (SD) E-health4Uth vs controlb E-health4Uth + consult vs controlc

E-health4Utha
n=63
E-health4Uth + consulta
n=63
Controla
n=68
Beta (95% CI) P Beta (95% CI) P
SDQ scored 14.44 (5.67) 12.79 (5.63) 14.57 (5.03) 0.04 (−1.60, 1.68) .96 −1.79 (−3.35, −0.22) .03
YSR scored 56.49 (27.86) 48.13 (25.45) 57.12 (27.66) −0.63 (−9.72, 8.47) .89 −9.11 (−17.52, −0.71) .03
CHQ-CF-GH4e 67.59 (17.14) 69.56 (18.37) 62.53 (20.08) 4.78 (−0.70, 10.25) .09 7.81 (2.41, 13.21) .005

aIn the E-health4Uth (5 of 63) and control group (4 of 68), some adolescents at risk of mental health problems also attended the consultation after they referred themselves to the nurse. In the E-health4Uth and consultation group, 57 of the 63 referred adolescents attended the consultation.

bE-health4Uth vs control group: analyses were adjusted for the baseline value of each outcome. Multilevel linear regression.

cE-health4Uth and consultation vs control group: analyses were adjusted for age and the baseline value of each outcome. Multilevel linear regression.

dA higher score indicates more mental health problems (SDQ range 0-40, YSR range 0-210).

eA higher score indicates a better health-related quality of life (range 0-100).