Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 15;155(7):2696–2703. doi: 10.1210/en.2014-1050

Table 1.

Selected Parameters of Study Monkeys

Parameter C Monkeys PA Monkeys
Age/somatometric
    Age (y) 24.0 ± 0.9 25.8 ± 0.7
    BMI (kg/m2) 41.9 ± 2.2 38.1 ± 2.9
    % Abdominal fat 48.6 ± 3.8 33.3 ± 3.1a
    Subcutaneous abdominal fat (cm3) 816 ± 362 346 ± 84
    Visceral fat (cm3) 1066 ± 98 630 ± 99b
    Ratio sc abdominal/visceral fat 0.7 ± 0.3 0.7 ± 0.2
Metabolic physiology
    Basal total FFAs (mM/L) 522 ± 84 1052 ± 380c
    Area-under-the curve total FFAs (mM/L per 180 min) 75.7 ± 0.9 104.1 ± 15.2
    Basal insulin (μU/mL) 52.7 ± 12.7 19.3 ± 36.7
    Basal glucose (mg/dL) 57.9 ± 1.4 73.5 ± 10.2
    Insulin sensitivity (SI) 1.4 ± 1.0 3.4 ± 2.7
    Glycosylated hemoglobin (%) 8.0 ± 0.4 9.6 ± 1.6
Reproductive physiology
    Basal T (ng/mL) 0.2 ± 0.1 0.4 ± 0.1d
    % Intermittent/absent menstrual cycles 0 67e
    % Polycystic ovaries 0 83f
Ratio of mRNA expression
    Zfp423/C/EBPα 0.12 ± 0.01 0.35 ± 0.02g
    Zfp423/PPARλ 0.40 ± 0.03 0.41 ± 0.03
    Zfp423/PPARδ 0.57 ± 0.07 0.62 ± 0.02
Positive correlation with basal T levels (ng/mL)
    Basal insulin (μU/mL) r2 = 0.65, P < .029 (All female monkeys combined)
    Glycosylated hemoglobin (%) r2 = 0.62, P < .035 (All female monkeys combined)
    Total FFAs (μM/L) r2 = 0.73, P < .002 (All female monkeys combined)

Data are mean ± SEM.

a

P < .021 vs C.

b

P < .029 vs C.

c

P < .059 vs C.

d

P < .020 vs C.

e

P < .062 vs C.

f

P < .016 vs C.

g

P < .001 vs C.