Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 17;5:609. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00609

Table 2.

Parameter estimates from preliminary analysis examining cognitive reappraisal and gaze direction effects on emotional responding.

Emotion response latent criterion variable B (SE)
Indicators Factor loadings
Self-reported intensity 0.961 (0.279)*
Corrugator activity 0.508 (0.085)**
Heart rate 0.077 (0.1)
Skin conductance 0.003 (0.001)+
Within-subjects predictors B (SE)
CR CONTRASTS
Decrease—viewa −0.637 (0.171)**
Increase—viewa 0.997 (0.237)**
No CR—view −0.176 (0.063)*
GAZE DIRECTION CONTRASTS
Arousing—not directeda 0.07 (0.04)+
Non-arousing—not directeda −0.166 (0.069)*
CR × GAZE DIRECTION INTERACTION CONTRASTS
(Decrease—view) × (Arousing—not directed) −0.112 (0.07)
(Increase—view) × (Arousing—not directed) 0.051 (0.066)
(No CR—view) × (Arousing—not directed) −0.021 (0.062)
(Decrease—view) × (Non-arousing—not directed) 0.197 (0.079)*
(Increase—view) × (Non-arousing—not directed) −0.045 (0.061)
(No CR—view) × (Non-arousing—not directed) −0.037 (0.06)

CR, cognitive reappraisal. Pre-instruction activity was a positive, significant predictor of post-instruction activity for all three physiological measures; these estimates are not reported for the sake of brevity.

a

Slope was estimated as a random effect.

**

p < 0.001,

*

p < 0.05,

+

p < 0.10.