Table 1.
Total food intake (g)* | Initial body weight (g) | Final body weight (g) | Body weight gain (g)* | Diet efficiency (%)* | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 (n = 10) | 1018.2 ± 55.9a | 21.8 ± 1.1 | 39.7 ± 7.9 | 18.0 ± 7.5 | 1.8 ± 0.4 |
CONT (n = 13) | 1252.4 ± 84.1 | 20.8 ± 1.3 | 39.3 ± 9.9 | 18.5 ± 10.6 | 1.5 ± 0.9 |
FOS (n = 14) | 1167.1 ± 50.5 | 20.5 ± 1.5 | 41.0 ± 6.4 | 20.3 ± 5.9 | 1.7 ± 0.5 |
GM (n = 15) | 1243.1 ± 79.1 | 20.5 ± 1.5 | 36.2 ± 7.2 | 15.7 ± 7.7 | 1.3 ± 0.7b |
Values were expressed as mean ± SD. R1, SAMR1, and control diet; CONT, control diet; FOS, 5% of fructooligosaccharide diet; GM, 5% of glucomannan diet. *Total food intake, and body weight gain, diet efficiency were calculated based on the feeding periods during 38 weeks. aR1 was significantly different versus CONT, FOS, and GM, respectively, at P < 0.05 by Tukey's post hoc test. bGM was significantly different than R1, FOS, and GM, respectively, at P < 0.05 by Tukey's post hoc test.