Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2013 Oct 11;231(4):765–775. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3286-3

Table 2.

Effects of treatment and diagnosis on cognitive performance as raw means

Task Variable Schizophrenia Control Treatment Treatment x Diagnosis

Mecamylamine Varenicline Placebo Mecamylamine Varenicline Placebo F df p value F df p value
CPT-IP 2-digit Hit rate (number) 25.2 ± 4.5 26.2 ± 5.1 25.3 ± 5.4 28.8 ± 2.4 29.2 ± 1.7 29.3 ± 1.0 1.12 2, 125 0.3310 0.97 2, 125 0.3825
 False alarms (ln) 0.69 ± 0.71 0.76 ± 0.87 0.57 ± 0.71 0.35 ± 0.49 0.22 ± 0.39 0.34 ± 0.47 0.15 2, 125 0.8603 1.82 2, 125 0.1656
Random errors (ln) 0.90 ± 1.03 0.66 ± 1.07 0.57 ± 0.96 0.18 ± 0.43 0.21 ± 0.45 0.12 ± 0.27 3.13 2, 125 0.0473 2.59 2, 125 0.0788
HRT (ms) 529.6 ± 80.6 478.6 ± 76.8 474.9 ± 68.8 451.5 ± 62.9 430.3 ± 55.3 441.9 ± 61.6 14.37 2, 125 <0.0001 4.59 2, 126 0.0119
SD HRT (ms) 141.6 ± 57.5 120.5 ± 58.5 123.1 ± 44.9 91.2 ± 31.1 83.2 ± 30.2 87.8 ± 21.7 6.04 2, 126 0.0031 1.45 2, 126 0.2382
 d prime 2.91 ± 0.96 3.07 ± 1.17 3.04 ± 1.05 3.80 ± 0.53 3.93 ± 0.48 3.87 ± 0.44 1.21 2, 124 0.3028 0.08 2, 125 0.9277
3-digit Hit rate (number) 23.1 ± 5.8 23.7 ± 6.7 23.3 ± 7.1 26.4 ± 4.4 27.4 ± 4.0 27.0 ± 4.1 0.38 2, 124 0.6859 0.20 2, 124 0.8161
 False alarms (ln) 1.19 ± 0.96 1.04 ± 1.05 1.03 ± 0.90 0.64 ± 0.62 0.61 ± 0.63 0.51 ± 0.62 1.32 2, 125 0.2720 0.75 2, 125 0.4749
Random errors (ln) 1.14 ± 1.14 0.80 ± 1.17 0.76 ± 1.08 0.20 ± 0.41 0.26 ± 0.44 0.19 ± 0.35 3.33 2, 125 0.0389 4.86 2, 125 0.0093
HRT (ms) 556.5 ± 93.9 524.8 ± 102.4 519.2 ± 81.5 489.7 ± 67.5 455.9 ± 55.2 480.9 ± 69.7 7.10 2, 125 0.0012 1.56 2, 125 0.2148
SD HRT (ms) 162.8 ± 65.0 137.3 ± 72.3 143.0 ± 72.3 106.1 ± 36.2 93.8 ± 34.4 103.7 ± 35.3 5.52 2, 125 0.0050 0.84 2, 125 0.4350
 d prime 2.26 ± 1.23 2.45 ± 1.34 2.54 ± 1.17 3.19 ± 0.82 3.38 ± 0.87 3.35 ± 0.80 1.88 2, 124 0.1566 0.02 2, 124 0.9769
4-digit Hit rate (number) 19.0 ± 6.5 21.9 ± 5.6 21.8 ± 6.1 23.5 ± 4.8 23.9 ± 5.2 24.2 ± 4.1 7.75 2, 123 0.0007 4.17 2, 123 0.0177
 False alarms (ln) 1.69 ± 0.82 1.84 ± 0.73 1.68 ± 0.81 1.46 ± 0.68 1.57 ± 0.70 1.42 ± 0.76 1.82 2, 124 0.1666 0.07 2, 125 0.9355
Random errors (ln) 1.31 ± 1.04 1.03 ± 1.15 1.14 ± 1.06 0.45 ± 0.54 0.24 ± 0.42 0.37 ± 0.52 4.24 2, 125 0.0166 0.07 2, 125 0.9308
HRT (ms) 591.4 ± 113.2 542.3 ± 96.6 552.4 ± 81.8 524.8 ± 74.7 502.8 ± 76.4 517.6 ± 70.4 8.61 2, 124 0.0003 1.54 2, 125 0.2195
SD HRT (ms) 159.3 ± 52.2 147.8 ± 81.5 152.9 ± 58.7 122.6 ± 40.1 104.9 ± 36.2 114.7 ± 38.5 2.70 2, 126 0.0708 0.21 2, 126 0.8095
 d prime 1.41 ± 0.90 1.58 ± 0.96 1.75 ± 1.04 2.11 ± 0.80 2.05 ± 0.89 2.18 ± 0.76 2.30 2, 123 0.1049 1.41 2, 123 0.2472
Stroop Interference score 50.2 ± 6.8 52.8 ± 8.0 50.3 ± 8.3 54.4 ± 10.5 53.3 ± 9.2 53.5 ± 8.6 0.56 2, 125 0.5741 2.12 2, 125 0.1239
N-back 2-back Hit rate 0.58 ± 0.27 0.63 ± 0.26 0.64 ± 0.25 0.83 ± 0.15 0.82 ± 0.19 0.80 ± 0.19 0.48 2, 120 0.6192 3.02 2, 120 0.0525
 Error rate 0.26 ± 0.22 0.23 ± 0.22 0.20 ± 0.20 0.12 ± 0.11 0.17 ± 0.20 0.12 ± 0.11 1.75 2, 121 0.1780 1.77 2, 122 0.1739
 HRT (ms) 909.2 ± 250.9 931.2 ± 297.9 894.4 ± 282.1 864.6 ± 253.9 795.8 ± 241.7 825.7 ± 229.3 1.05 2, 120 0.3536 1.01 2, 121 0.3668
 SD HRT (ms) 477.2 ± 189.0 427.7 ± 177.9 450.3 ± 158.0 344.5 ± 130.5 342.0 ± 150.6 385.6 ± 174.1 1.89 2, 121 0.1553 1.34 2, 121 0.2651
VSWM Mean distance, immediate (ln) 2.83 ± 0.71 2.72 ± 0.66 2.87 ± 0.76 2.29 ± 0.54 2.28 ± 0.54 2.25 ± 0.53 1.04 2, 121 0.3567 0.63 2, 121 0.5347
Mean dist., 30sec delay (ln) 4.01 ± 0.64 4.01 ± 0.69 4.00 ± 0.76 3.58 ± 0.46 3.62 ± 0.53 3.64 ± 0.40 0.26 2, 120 0.7735 1.15 2, 120 0.3196
Difference (30sec – imm.) (ln) 3.52 ± 0.92 3.64 ± 0.81 3.48 ± 1.00 3.24 ± 0.54 3.31 ± 0.60 3.36 ± 0.40 1.13 2, 123 0.3261 1.21 2, 123 0.3030

CPT-IP, Continuous Performance Test-Identical Pairs; ln, natural logarithm; ms, milliseconds; HRT, hit reaction time; SD, standard deviation; VSWM, Visual Spatial Working Memory. Values are shown as raw means ± SD.