Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 14;14:71. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-71

Table 2.

Relationship of the variables between DPR and CBCT images

 
Variables for DPR images
Total
Chi-square
P value
Variables for CBCT images Interruption in white line of IAC Diversion of IAC Narrowing of IAC Darkening of roots Other      
Types of IMTM
Type A
n
41
8
8
40
5
102
10.4783
0.233
 
%
40.2
7.8
7.8
39.2
4.9
100.0
 
 
Type B
n
32
5
11
20
2
70
 
 
 
%
45.71
7.14
15.71
28.57
2.86
100.00
 
 
Type C
n
38
12
13
59
4
126
 
 
 
%
30.16
9.52
10.32
46.83
3.17
100.00
 
 
Total
n
111
25
32
119
11
298
 
 
 
%
37.25
8.39
10.74
39.93
3.69
100.00
 
 
Buccolingual relationship of IAC-IMTM
Buccal
n
21
2
4
21
1
49
11.351
0.499
 
 
%
42.9
4.1
8.2
42.9
2.0
100.0%
 
 
 
Lingual
n
68
16
22
80
9
195
 
 
 
 
%
34.9
8.2
11.3
41.0
4.6
100.0%
 
 
 
Interradicular
n
5
0
1
7
0
13
 
 
 
 
%
38.5
0.0
7.7
53.8
0.0
100.0%
 
 
 
Inferior
n
17
7
5
11
1
41
 
 
 
 
%
41.5
17.1
12.2
26.8
2.4
100.0%
 
 
 
Total
n
111
25
32
119
11
298
 
 
 
 
%
37.2
8.4
10.7
39.9
3.7
100.0%
 
 
Position of IAC-IMTM
Contact
n
61
23
27
101
1
213
54.113
0.000*
 
%
28.6
10.8
12.7
47.4
0.5
100.0%
 
 
No contact
n
50
2
5
18
10
85
 
 
 
%
58.8
2.4
5.9
21.2
11.8
100.0%
 
 
Total
n
111
25
32
119
11
298
 
 
 
%
37.2
8.4
10.7
39.9
3.7
100.0%
 
 
Mandible shape
Type 1
n
46
13
15
62
1
137
13.720
0.089
 
 
%
33.6
9.5
10.9
45.3
0.7
100.0%
 
 
 
Type 2
n
13
1
4
5
1
24
 
 
 
 
%
54.2
4.2
16.7
20.8
4.2
100.0%
 
 
 
Type 3
n
52
11
13
52
9
137
 
 
 
 
%
38.0
8.0
9.5
38.0
6.6
100.0%
 
 
 
Total
n
111
25
32
119
11
298
 
 
    % 37.2 8.4 10.7 39.9 3.7 100.0%    

DPR: Digital panoramic radiography.

CBCT: Cone-beam computed tomography.

IAC: Inferior alveolar canal.

IMTM: Impacted mandibular third molar.

*Statistically significant difference p < 0.05.