Table 2.
Unadjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) between functional state of household infrastructure and carer negative affect and risk of depression at baseline
| Primary explanatory variables | |
|
High negative affect |
High risk of depression |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Missing |
Carers |
|
|
|
|
|
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) 1 | OR (95% CI) | n (%) 1 | OR (95% CI) | |
|
All carers |
|
328 (100) |
75 (22.9) |
- |
53 (16.2) |
- |
|
Number of HLP components failed
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0-4 (better function) |
44 (13.4) |
94 (33.1) |
25 (26.6) |
1.0 |
8 (8.5) |
1.0 |
| 5-8 (poorer function) |
|
190 (66.9) |
39 (20.5) |
0.71 (0.42-1.22) |
40 (21.1) |
2.87 (1.18-6.94) |
|
Overall Surveyor Function Score
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Better (scores 1–2) |
17 (5.2) |
88 (28.3) |
20 (22.7) |
1.0 |
13 (14.4) |
1.0 |
| Worse (scores 3–7) | 223 (71.7) | 49 (22.0) | 0.96 (0.54-1.69) | 38 (17.2) | 1.23 (0.59-2.55) | |
1Number and percentage of carers classified as having high negative affect or being at high risk of depression.
2Functional state of infrastructure components required to conduct Healthy Living Practices (HLPs) were observed (and tested where appropriate) by the surveyor.
NOTE: Bold font indicates the variable was significant at p ≤ 0.05.