Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 18;21(3):243–254. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dst054

Table 1.

Mapping statistics of sequenced reads from unamplified and amplified libraries

Method Replicate Platform Library type Total reads Mapped (%) Duplicatesa (%) Properb (%) Both mapped (%) Median insert (bp) Median coverage
Unamplified 1 HiSeq Short 41 688 676 99.7 0.8 98.1 99.5 285 38
2 HiSeq Short 16 333 732 89.4 0.6 88 89.3 357 13
Phi 1 HiSeq Short 48 501 916 99.4 0.7 98 98.8 224 46
2 HiSeq Short 20 656 296 95.2 0.8 88.6 93.7 349 18
Tre 1 HiSeq Short 44 481 270 99.3 1.1 97.6 98.7 237 40
2 HiSeq Short 25 188 788 96.2 0.7 92 95.3 328 22
Rap 1 HiSeq Short 26 277 398 89.3 2.8 71.6 80.1 248 15
2 HiSeq Short 22 278 134 82.5 35.7 60 73.7 308 3
Unamplified 1 HiSeq Long 60 856 860 99.5 9 97.2 99.1 2631 41
2 MiSeq Long 2 551 720 86.4 1 79.1 85.4 2136 2
Phi 1 HiSeq Long 61 735 210 99.5 3.5 81.5 99.2 2576 39
2 MiSeq Long 2 760 576 99.3 1.2 80.2 98.9 2025 2
Tre 1 HiSeq Long 55 842 586 99.4 3.4 82.6 99 2285 29
2 MiSeq Long 2 999 856 99.4 1 73 98.9 2094 2
Rap 1 HiSeq Long 58 443 656 99.4 7.6 92.1 99 2591 35
2 MiSeq Long 3 914 622 99 6.6 91.8 98.7 2121 2

All percentages are relative to total number of reads in each replicate.

aReads that are identical copies of other reads and have exact mapped coordinates on the genome.

bReads mapped in the correct orientation and at a distance corresponding to that predicted by the fragment library size.