Skip to main content
. 2014 May 31;14:59. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-59

Table 5.

Worsened and improved OIDP from 2007 to 2012 (improved versus all others and worsened versus all others) regressed on country of residence and change scores of reference variables, OR and 95% CI

 
Worsened OIDP
Improved OIDP
  Unadjusted OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI) Unadjusted OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Norway
1
1
1
1
Sweden
0.6 (0.5-0.7)
0.6 (0.5-0.6)
1.1 (0.9-1.3)
1.1 (0.9-1.2)
Satisfaction with oral health
 
 
 
 
Stable
1
1
1
1
Worsened
2.9 (2.5-3.5)
1.9 (1.6-2.3)
0.9 (0.7-1.1)
0.8 (0.6-1.0)
Improved
0.6 (0.5-0.8)
0.5 (0.4-0.7)
3.3 (2.8-3.8)
2.0 (1.7-2.4)
Satisfaction with tooth appearance
 
 
 
 
Stable
1
1
1
1
Worsened
2.6 (2.2-3.1)
1.8 (1.5-2.2)
0.9 (0.7-1.0)
0.8 (0.7-1.1)
Improved
0.6 (0.5-0.8)
0.6 (0.5-0.8)
2.8 (2.4-3.2)
1.8 (1.5-2.1)
Change tooth loss
 
 
 
 
Stable all teeth
1
1
1
1
Lost teeth 2007-2012
3.6 (2.9-4.6)
3.3 (2.6-4.2)
1.5 (1.2-2.0)
1.7 (1.3-2.1)
Stable tooth loss
3.2 (2.7-3.7)
3.5 (2.9-4.2)
3.6 (3.1-4.2)
3.2 (2.8-3.8)
Nagelkerke’s R2 13.5     12.4