Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 18.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Manag Care. 2012 Nov;18(11):704–712.

Table 3. Published Reports from Individual Health Plans.

Reference Reporting Site Diagnosis Years No. Women with Invasive Breast Cancer No. (%) women not evaluated for HER2 % HER2 positive1 No. (%) women who received trastuzumab without a documented positive HER2 result No. (%) HER2 positive women who received trastuzumab
Stark (2004) 27 Henry Ford Health System 1999-2000 451 212 (48%) Not reported Not reported Not reported
Onitilo (2009) 28 Marshfield Clinic 1998-2005 1767 612 (35%)2 201 (18%) Not reported Not reported
Barron (2009) 29 Three commercial health plans 2005-mid 2006 322 6 (2%) 72 (21%) 1/52 (2%) 39/45 (87%) stage II or higher
Webster (2010) 30 SW Wales Cancer Network (UK) 2006-2007 453 61 (13.5%) 47 (10%) Not reported 34/47 (72.3%)
Webster (2010) 30 SW Wales Cancer Network (UK) – Cardiff & Vale only 2005-2008 121 Not reported 121 (100%)3 Not reported 93/121 (76.8%)
Coulson (2010) 31 North Trent Cancer Network (UK) Sept. 2007 – Aug. 2008 13194 Not reported 199 (15%) Not reported 133/199 (67%)
Haas (2011)32 Aetna July 2006 – June 2007 775 24 (3.1%) 137 (18%) 25/104 (24%) 79/137 (57.7%) stage I, II, or III
Goddard (2011)33 Kaiser Permanente Northwest 1998-2007 3054 579 (19%) 496 (14%) 26/134 (19%) 19/32 (60%) distant metastatic
28/41 (68%) regional (after 2005)
35/79 (44%) localized (after 2005)
1

of those evaluated for HER2 status.

2

women were not tested for ER/PR or HER2. The data for HER2 alone were not reported separately.

3

Selected for the study on these criteria.

4

metastatic breast cancer cases were excluded