Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Apr 24;40(6):943–953. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.03.019

Table 4.

Astigmatism in 10 patient models with fiber-independent and fiber dependent material formulations before and after simulated refractive crosslinking using a linear bow-tie treatment (pattern 4) with 2x corneal stiffening aligned on the flat axis of astigmatism.

Fiber-Independent Material Model
Fiber-Dependent Material Model
Pretreatment (D)
Posttreatment (D)
Change (D)
Posttreatment (D)
Change (D)
Parameter Ksteep Kflat Ksteep Kflat Ksteep Kflat Astig Ratio Ksteep Kflat Ksteep Kflat Astig Flattening Ratio
Patient
    1 42.79 40.10 42.13 40.54 –0.66 0.44 –1.10 0.66 42.01 40.4 –0.78 0.30 –1.08 0.38
    2 44.12 41.91 43.48 42.39 –0.64 0.48 –1.12 0.75 43.39 42.21 –0.73 0.30 –1.03 0.41
    3 47.96 44.04 47.37 44.57 –0.59 0.53 –1.12 0.89 47.32 44.36 –0.64 0.32 –0.96 0.50
    4 44.18 41.11 43.55 41.58 –0.63 0.47 –1.10 0.74 43.53 41.41 –0.65 0.30 –0.95 0.46
    5 43.91 42.64 43.5 43.15 –0.41 0.51 –0.92 1.24 43.28 42.9 –0.63 0.26 –0.89 0.41
    6 43.11 40.36 42.34 40.68 –0.77 0.32 –1.09 0.41 42.3 40.69 –0.81 0.33 –1.14 0.40
    7 45.40 43.02 44.94 43.3 –0.46 0.28 –0.74 0.60 44.62 43.45 –0.78 0.43 –1.21 0.55
    8 44.07 41.97 43.42 42.47 –0.65 0.50 –1.15 0.76 43.37 42.27 –0.70 0.30 –1.00 0.42
    9 44.00 41.21 43.38 41.69 –0.62 0.48 –1.10 0.77 43.34 41.51 –0.66 0.30 –0.96 0.45
    10 46.20 44.80 45.74 45.57 –0.46 0.77 –1.23 1.67 45.68 45.4 –0.52 0.60 –1.12 1.15
Statistic
    Mean 44.57 42.12 43.99 42.59 –0.59 0.48 –1.07 0.85 43.88 42.46 –0.69 0.34 –1.03 0.52
    SD 1.55 1.53 1.60 1.61 0.11 0.13 0.14 0.36 1.59 1.60 0.09 0.10 0.10 0.23
    P value* <.001 <.001 <.001 .5

Astig = asigmatism; Kflat = keratometry in flat meridian; Ksteep = keratometry in steep meridian

*

Student t test on pretreatment – posttreatment values