Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Anal. 2013 Dec 18;18(6):914–926. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2013.12.005

Figure 13.

Figure 13

Results of registration for TEM/confocal images using MI similarity measure with directly registration (first row) and our proposed IA method (second and third rows) using (a, d, g) rigid registration (b, e, h) affine registration and (c, f, i) b-spline registration. The results are shown in a checkerboard image for comparison. Here, first and second rows show the checkerboard images of the original TEM/confocal images 1 while the third row shows the checkerboard image of the results of our proposed IA method. Differences are generally small, but some improvements can be observed for B-spline registration.

1The grayscale values of original TEM image are inverted for better visualization