Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 19;31(7):1788–1800. doi: 10.1007/s11095-013-1283-1

Table II.

Bioactive Equivalence Evaluation of Candidate BECCs and MRCs by In Vitro Assays

In vitro assay Candidate BECCs (I) MRCs (I) Candidate BECCs (II) MRCs (II) Candidate BECCs (III) MRCs (III)
HUVECs
 Cell viability 2.1–13.2% 1.5–23.6% 20.7–58.8% 23.7–44.8% 77.0–100.4% 77.8–107.7%
 LDH 79.6–93.6% 73.5–91.1%
 ROS 78.6–85.1% 73.7–79.0%
Macrophages
 NO 10.5–18.0% 8.4–13.0% 49.0–56.0% 53.1–63.1% 80.6–92.3% 91.8–100.4%
 IL-6 81.7–84.1% 78.6–81.0%
 PGE2 120.1–150.0% 147.1–185.3%
Cardiomyocytes
 Cell viability 38.3–47.8% 13.7–52.1% 22.5–27.3% 8.2–23.0% 75.6–105.9% 77.3–104.8%

n = 3. Bioactive equivalence was evaluated by two one-sided t test. The 90% CI of relative efficacy of candidate BECCs and MRCs compared to original CP was showd in the table. If the 90% CI of relative efficacy fell within the range of 70–143%, the candidate BECCs were considered to be a bioactive equivalent with original Cardiotonic Pill

BECCs bioactive equivalent combinatorial components; MRCs mixture of reference compounds