Table 5.
Interventions instituted by pastoralists against CBPP cases, Narok, Kenya 1999–2005.
| Type of intervention used | Total, n (%) | Mara, n (%) | Loita, n (%) | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | 35 (31.0) | 11 (42.3) | 24 (27.6) | 0.2378 |
| (22.8–40.5) | (24.0–62.8) | (18.8–38.4) | ||
| Vaccination | 12 (10.6) | 4 (15.4) | 8 (9.2) | 0.5909 |
| (5.9–18.2) | (5.0–35.7) | (4.3–17.8) | ||
| Treatment and vaccination | 42 (37.2) | 4 (15.4) | 38 (43.7) | 0.0169 |
| (28.4–46.8) | (5.0–35.7) | (33.2–54.7) | ||
| Nothing | 6 (5.4) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (6.9) | 0.3798 |
| (2.2–11.7) | (0.0–16.0) | (2.8–15.0) | ||
| Reporting | 5 (4.4) | 2 (7.7) | 3 (3.4) | 0.6939 |
| (1.6–10.5) | (1.3–26.6) | (0.9–10.5) | ||
| Traditional quarantine and treatment | 3 (2.7) | 2 (7.7) | 1 (1.1) | 0.2504 |
| (0.7–8.1) | (1.3–26.6) | (0.1–7.1) | ||
| Reporting and vaccination | 2 (1.8) | 2 (7.7) | 0 (0.0) | 0.0777 |
| (0.3–6.9) | (1.3–26.6) | (0.0–5.3) | ||
| Traditional quarantine and vaccination | 2 (1.8) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (2.3) | 0.9465 |
| (0.3–6.9) | (0.0–16.0) | (0.4–8.8) | ||
| Traditional quarantine, reporting, treatment and vaccination | 2 (1.8) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (2.3) | 0.9465 |
| (0.3–6.9) | (0.0–16.0) | (0.4–8.8) | ||
| Traditional quarantine, report, treatment, slaughter and vaccination | 2 (1.8) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (2.3) | 0.9465 |
| (0.3–6.9) | (0.0–16.0) | (0.4–8.8) | ||
| Reporting and treatment | 1 (0.9) | 1 (3.8) | 0 (0.0) | 0.5314 |
| (0.1–6.5) | (0.2–21.6) | (0.0–5.3) | ||
| Reporting, treatment, and vaccination | 1 (0.9) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.1) | 0.4949 |
| (0.1–6.5) | (0.0–16.0) | (0.1–7.1) | ||
| Total | 113 (100.0) | 26 (100.0) | 87 (100.0) | |
The proportions (%) are of the total herds affected between 1999 and 2005; 26 in Loita division and 87 in Mara division. The values below the the numbers and proportions, in parentheses, are their 95% confidence intervals. The p value is for the difference in proportions.