Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 19.
Published in final edited form as: Diabetes Educ. 2013 Sep 19;39(6):761–771. doi: 10.1177/0145721713504630

Table 3.

Intervention dose and content delivered, according to Risk Group1

Risk Group1
Intervention Dosage Low (N = 16) Moderate (N = 57) High (N = 31)
Visits
Mean (SD) Percent of expected visits2*** 90% (12.9) 74% (13.1) 66% (15.8%)
Median number of visits*** 5.5 11 28
Median total minutes*** 245 400 955
Median Length of visits** 36.7 34.0 31.6
Educational Content
Diabetes Intro2 8%(12) 6%(8) 9%(11)
Monitoring2** 33%(15) 39%(13) 47%(14)
Healthy coping2 29%(14) 29%(15) 29%(9)
Reducing risk2* 35%(17) 26%(14) 32%(13)
Healthy eating2 48%(22) 45%(17) 50%(17)
Being active2* 32%(9) 29%(12) 23%(9)
Taking meds2 36%(16) 43%(17) 45%(18)
Problem solving2 29%(12) 28%(12) 26%(12)
CHW-Participant Goal setting and Reminders
Review Doctor Appointments3 median* 2.5 4 4
Review Labs needed3 median 1 1 1
Set/Reviewed Goals2* 93%(21) 93%(15) 81%(30)
*

p < 0.05

**

p < 0.01

***

p > 0.001

1

Risk Group refers to algorithm category assigned for the greatest amount time over the intervention year, taking into account changes in risk (see Table 1)

2

Percents of visits in which educational content was discussed.

3

Review of doctor appointments and lab tests due occurred as needed, according to ADA guidelines per year37, using count data.