Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 19;9(6):e100055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100055

Table 3. Association analyses of the candidate SNPs with ESCC risk.

MAF Dominant Recessive Overdominant
Case Control OR (95% CI)a p OR (95% CI)a p OR (95% CI)a p
miR-124-1 rs531564 C>G 0.143 0.156 0.94 (0.78, 1.12) 0.477 0.61 (0.43, 0.86) 0.005 1.02 (0.84, 1.22) 0.867
miR-34 rs4938723 T>C 0.317 0.329 1.02 (0.87, 1.21) 0.780 0.82 (0.71, 0.95) 0.007 1.17 (0.99, 1.38) 0.066
miR-26-1 rs7372209 G>A 0.307 0.296 1.03 (0.87, 1.21) 0.743 1.11 (0.96, 1.27) 0.158 0.96 (0.81, 1.13) 0.615
miR-27 rs895819 A>G 0.261 0.253 1.04 (0.88, 1.23) 0.642 1.03 (0.88, 1.21) 0.707 1.02 (0.86, 1.21) 0.782
miR-218 rs11134527 T>C 0.404 0.397 0.98 (0.83, 1.16) 0.829 1.08 (0.97, 1.21) 0.170 0.90 (0.77, 1.07) 0.228
a

Adjusted for age, sex, drinking and smoking.