Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Sex Res. 2013 Dec 19;51(7):731–741. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2013.843148

Table 2.

Mean Number of Topics Discussed by Communication Partner and Gender, Ethnicity, and Sexual Activity Status

Dating Partners Parents Best Friends Mixed-Model ANOVA


M (SD) M (SD) M (SD) F (Within) η 2 F (Between) η 2 F (Interaction) η 2
Gender 116.51*** .17 23.03*** .04 7.79*** .01
 Girls (n=337) 1.55 (2.05) 3.27 (2.39) 3.15 (2.28)
 Boys (n=252) 1.31 (1.98) 2.35 (2.35) 2.23 (2.19)
Ethnicity 100.50*** .15 3.70* .02 3.90** .02
 Caucasian (n=275) 1.37 (1.96) 2.48 (2.34) 2.79 (2.31) |
 African American (n=140) 1.73 (2.13) 3.45 (2.49) 3.17 (2.30)
 Latino (n=128) 1.38 (2.06) 2.91 (2.40) 2.32 (2.20)
 Mixed/Other (n=46) 1.24 (1.88) 3.39 (2.26) 2.48 (2.18)
Sexually Active 23.96*** .04 18.27*** .03 7.76** .01
 Yes (n=56) 2.95 (2.14) 3.18 (2.28) 3.79 (2.11)
 No (n=533) 1.29 (1.94) 2.84 (2.43) 2.65 (2.28)

Note. Scale range for number of sexual topics = 0 – 6. F (Within) = within-group comparison by communication partner (dating partner, parent, or best friend). F (between) = between-group comparison by gender, ethnicity, or sexual activity status. η2=partial eta squared effect size. N = 589 [14 participants were excluded due to missing data on parent or friend communication (n=7), ethnicity (n =1). or sexual activity status (n=6)].

*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001