Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 31;24(6):1565–1578. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht007

Table 3.

Values from a 1-way ANOVA comparing correlation values between controls and CP in visual stimulation (top section) and resting state (bottom section) experiments

Network Mean control Mean CP F P Partial η2
Visual stimulation experiment
 Faces (R + L core) 0.53 0.51 0.08 0.77 0.001
 Ant. temp. (R) individual 0.34 0.26 6.87 0.02 0.34
 Ant. temp. (R) matched group 0.28 0.23 5.09 0.04 0.27
 Amygdala (R) 0.27 0.35 10.94 0.005 0.43
 Amygdala (R + L) 0.28 0.29 0.26 0.61 0.008
 Buildings (PPA + TOS) 0.54 0.56 0.13 0.72 0.01
 Between 0.13 0.15 0.37 0.54 0.004
Resting state experiment
 Faces (R + L core) 0.43 0.39 2.29 0.13 0.04
 Ant. temp. (R) individual 0.25 0.23 0.14 0.70 0.01
 Ant. temp. (R) matched group 0.13 0.19 2.40 0.14 0.14
 Amygdala (R) 0.21 0.28 8.78 0.02 0.38
 Amygdala (R + L) 0.24 0.24 0.00 0.98 0.000
 Buildings (PPA + TOS) 0.42 0.43 0.05 0.82 0.005
 Between 0.29 0.29 0.02 0.88 0.000

The table presents the statistical values obtained by comparing the correlation levels of CPs and controls using a 1-way ANOVAs. Each row depicts the mean correlation values across all comparisons in each group. The analysis was conducted across all regions of the core face network (first row in each section); the core network with the anterior temporal cortex (defined individually for each participant, or defined based on the control group ROI) and amygdala; the connectivity within the building-related network; and the connectivity between the entire face and building networks. Significant differences are indicated in bold.