Skip to main content
. 2014 May 31;6(1):14. doi: 10.1186/1866-1955-6-14

Table 4.

Correlations between empathic behaviour and emotional reactivity

 
Peak amplitude
Peak latency
  Familiar Unfamiliar Familiar Unfamiliar
ASD group
 
 
 
 
EmQue total
.06 (.03)
-.09 (-.11)
-.20 (-.19)
-.20 (-.19)
†Emotional contagion
-.33 (-.29)
-.20 (-.17)
-.11 (-.12)
.43 (.41)
†#Attention
.18 (.12)
-.07 (-.11)
-.17 (-.17)
-.25 (-.22)
†Prosocial behaviour
.21 (.17)
-.03 (.004)
-.18 (-.18)
-.55* (-.53*)
TD group
 
 
 
 
EmQue total
-.14 (-.15)
-.34 (-.35)
.16 (.16)
-.29 (-.29)
†Emotional contagion
.12 (.12)
-.28 (-.29)
.28 (.26)
-.33 (-.32)
†#Attention
-.19 (-.19)
-.44* (-.44*)
-.004 (.000)
-.06 (-.06)
†Prosocial behaviour -.32 (-.33) -.08 (-.08) .09 (.09) -.30 (-.30)

This table shows the Pearson correlations (two-tailed) between everyday empathic behaviour (EmQue scores) and emotional reactivity as indexed by peak amplitude (familiar, unfamiliar) and peak latency (familiar, unfamiliar, across familiarity conditions). The r-values for partial correlations, controlling for the effect of cognitive ability (MSEL standard score), are in parentheses, and r-values outside parentheses are without controlling for this effect. † EmQue sub-scales, # Attention to Others’ Feelings, *P ≤ .05. Significant correlations are in bold.