Skip to main content
. 2014 May 1;116(12):1551–1560. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01322.2013

Table 3.

Lumbar and coccygeal vertebra morphology of young and old mice

Age-Level BV/TV, % Tb.Th, μm Tb.N, mm−1 Conn.D, mm−3 SMI vBMD, mg HA/mm3 Cort.Th, μm
Lumbar
    Young 21 ± 3 56 ± 3 5.2 ± 0.5 154 ± 32 1.6 ± 0.5 205 ± 23 98 ± 4
    Old 17 ± 5* 57 ± 0.06 4.6 ± 0.7* 105 ± 50* 1.7 ± 0.6 171 ± 44* 93 ± 11
Coccygeal
    Young 25 ± 3 83 ± 5 3.5 ± 0.2 41 ± 8 1.1 ± 0.3 229 ± 35 162 ± 11
    Old 38 ± 5* 106 ± 12* 3.9 ± 0.3* 42 ± 20 0.04 ± 0.7* 365 ± 49* 213 ± 31*

Values are means ± SD. BV/TV, bone volume/tissue volume; Tb.Th, trabecular thickness; Tb.N, trabecular number; Conn.D, connectivity density; SMI, structure model index; vBMD, volumetric bone mineral density; HA, hydroxyapatite; Cort.Th, cortical thickness.

*

Young vs. old of same vertebral level,

lumbar vs. coccygeal of same age: P < 0.05.