TABLE 3. Ever Drink Alcohol, Hierarchical Logistic Regression Models (n=498).
OR | 95% | CI | OR | 95% | CI | OR | 95% | CI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Migrant Carer Status | |||||||||
Non-migrant household | - | - | - | ||||||
TH-mother carer | 0.85 | 0.44 | 1.65 | 1.21 | 0.60 | 2.47 | 1.09 | 0.52 | 2.29 |
TH-father carer | 0.60 | 0.33 | 1.09 + | 0.62 | 0.33 | 1.15 | 0.53 | 0.26 | 1.07 + |
TH-other carer | 0.34 | 0.14 | 0.84 * | 0.44 | 0.17 | 1.10 + | 0.39 | 0.15 | 1.04 + |
Family alcohol use | 2.21 | 0.94 | 5.19 + | 2.09 | 0.87 | 5.02 | |||
Friends alcohol use | 4.26 | 2.54 | 7.16 *** | 4.92 | 2.77 | 8.75 *** | |||
Child is girl | 0.29 | 0.17 | 0.50 *** | ||||||
Father’s education | |||||||||
Primary or less | --- | ||||||||
More than primary | 0.97 | 0.53 | 1.77 | ||||||
Household wealth | |||||||||
Low | --- | ||||||||
Average | 1.28 | 0.71 | 2.29 | ||||||
High | 0.71 | 0.31 | 1.63 | ||||||
Older sibling | 1.14 | 0.68 | 1.94 | ||||||
Family functioning good | 0.66 | 0.38 | 1.12 | ||||||
Family arguments | 0.95 | 0.53 | 1.70 | ||||||
Pseudo R2 | 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.18 | ||||||
Log likehood | −221.96 | −204.31 | −185.74 |
Note: Model 3 controls for child age and province
p<.001
p<.01
p<.05
p<.1