Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar;8(1):21–26.

Table 2.

Characteristics of participants and comparison of serum zinc concentration of groups (mean± SD)

Variable n (%) (n = 961) Serum zinc at screening (µg/dl) p value
Age (year)* ≤19 42 (4.4) 93.02 (27.93) Non-significant
20-24 317 (33.0) 90.62 (27.63)
25-29 360 (37.5) 88.99 (24.88)
30-34 192 (20.0) 86.77 (24.53)
≥35 50 (5.2) 88.64 (25.73)
Body mass index (kg/m2)* at the first trimester < 19.8 133 (13.8) 90.51 (24.51) Non-significant
19.8-26 535 (55.7) 89.99 (27.01)
26.1-29.9 195 (20.3) 86.83 (25.08)
≥ 30 98 (10.2) 88.22 (23.29)
Parity (n) 0 612 (63.7) 91.03 (26.14) 0.022
1 266 (27.7) 86.81 (26.58)
≥2 83 (8.6) 83.86 (20.58)
Occupation (%) ** Housekeeper 868 (90.3) 89.44 (26.10) Non-significant
Employed 93 (9.7) 86.97 (24.07)
Educational status ** ≤ 5th grade 95 (9.9%) 88.92 (24.58) Non-significant
6th -8th grade 139 (14.4%) 84.83 (25.68)
9th -12th grade 586 (61.0%) 90.33 (26.12)
University 141(14.7%) 89.87 (25.83)
Last method of contraception Hormonal 134 (13.9%) 86.48 (24.12) Non-significant
IUD 50 (5.2%) 84.98 (26.52)
Barrier 94 (9.8%) 87.73 (24.50)
Withdrawal 489 (50.9%) 89.61 (25.66)
Nothing or breast feeding 194 (20.2%) 92.84 (28.05)
*

One-way ANOVA

**

T-test