Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 2;14:544. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-544

Table 1.

Meta-analysis of medication utilization and adherence outcomes

Analysis N cohorts* Rural/urban OR of treatment (95% CI) I 2 (%) Subgroup difference
Cardiovascular medication utilization
Overall - unadjusted
26
0.88 (0.79, 0.98)
97
NA
Overall - adjusted
23
1.02 (0.91, 1.13)
97
NA
Subgroup analysis – adjusted
 
 
 
Setting
 
 
 
 
  Community or population-based
8
1.15 (1.06, 1.25)
71
P < 0.0001
  Hospital
6
0.87 (0.83, 0.92)
34
 
  Ambulatory care practice
9
1.02 (0.85, 1.24)
78
 
Drug class
 
 
 
 
  Antithrombotic or anticoagulant
9
1.00 (0.88, 1.14)
88
P = 0.62
  Antihypertensive
16
1.03 (0.90, 1.17)
92
 
  Lipid lowering agent
4
0.94 (0.83, 1.07)
37
 
Disease
 
 
 
 
  Atrial fibrillation
3
0.83 (0.59, 1.16)
67
P = 0.0001
  Cardiovascular disease
11
0.95 (0.88, 1.03)
67
 
  Hypertension
6
1.07 (0.87, 1.33)
79
 
  Diabetes
3
1.21 (1.12, 1.31)
76
 
Age (study mean or median)
 
 
 
 
  <65 years
8
1.15 (1.04, 1.26)
80
P = 0.005
  ≥65 years
12
0.98 (0.88, 1.08)
70
  Not reported
3
0.89 (0.77, 1.02)
64
Country
 
 
 
 
  US
18
1.01 (0.92, 1.10)
87
P = 0.67
  Non-US
5
1.05 (0.88, 1.26)
88
 
Publication Year
 
 
 
 
  1999-2005
7
1.06 (0.91, 1.22)
76
P = 0.66
  2006-2011
16
1.01 (0.88, 1.15)
98
 
Data source
 
 
 
 
  Administrative data
2
1.17 (0.97, 1.41)
87
P = 0.19
  Medical record
14
0.97 (0.87, 1.08)
86
 
  Patient self-report
7
1.07 (0.93, 1.22)
72
 
Cardiovascular medication adherence
 
N
Rural/urban OR of treatment (95% CI)
I 2 (%)
Subgroup difference
Overall - unadjusted 4 0.94 (0.39, 2.27) 91 NA

*Data from 23 and 21 studies were included in the unadjusted and adjusted analyses, respectively: Ellis [43], Rice [66], Wan [71], and Williams [72] provided data for more than one cohort. CI = confidence interval; NA = not applicable; OR = odds ratio.