Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 1;64(2):183–192. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.64.183

Table 2.

Classification of rice accessions on the basis of polymorphism of DNA markers

Cultivated ecosystems Variety type Regions of varieties bred No. of accessions (%)

Cluster group Sum

I II
Irrigated lowland Landrace Kanto 1 0 1
Hokuriku 1 0 1
Tokai 1 0 1
Chugoku/Shikoku 2 1 3
Kyushu 0 2 2
Others 0 2 2

Sum 5 (1.5) 5 (1.5) 10 (3.1)

Improved Hokkaido 24 0 24
Tohoku 33 0 33
Kanto 17 3 20
Hokuriku 32 2 34
Tokai 40 1 41
Kinki 19 0 19
Chugoku/Shikoku 16 0 16
Kyushu 32 1 33
Others 1 0 1

Sum 214 (66.0) 7 (2.2) 221 (68.2)

 Total 219 (67.6) 12 (3.7) 231 (71.3)

Upland Landrace Tohoku 4 3 7
Kanto 2 17 19
Tokai 1 4 5
Kinki 1 1 2
Chugoku/Shikoku 2 1 3
Kyushu 2 5 7
Others 2 7 9

Sum 14 (4.3) 38 (11..7) 52 (16.0)

Improved Hokkaido 0 1 1
Tohoku 0 3 3
Kanto 0 7 7
Tokai 1 0 1
Kinki 1 3 4
Kyushu 0 1 1

Sum 2 (0.6) 15 (4.6) 17 (5.2)

 Total 16 (4.9) 53 (16.4) 69 (21.3)

Weedy Tokai 12 1 13
Chugoku/Shikoku 4 7 11

 Total 16 (4.9) 8 (2.5) 24 (7.4)

Grand total 251 (77.5) 73 (22.5) 324 (100.0)

Rice accessions were classified by using Ward’s hierarchical clustering method on the basis of polymorphism data on 64 SSR markers distributed over the 12 rice chromosomes.