Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Jul 8;105(4):667–687. doi: 10.1037/a0033485

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics and correlations between study variables

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 M(SD)
1. PCL-R Total 22.6 (7.8)
PCL-R Factors
2. Interpersonal/Affective .88 7.0 (3.8)
3. Social Deviance .87 .60 13.3 (3.9)
PCL-R Facets
4. Interpersonal .74 .84 .47 2.9 (2.2)
5. Affective .76 .87 .56 .46 4.1 (2.3)
6. Lifestyle .76 .55 .84 .49 .46 6.1 (2.1)
7. Antisocial .73 .49 .84 .31 .49 .42 7.2 (2.4)
Control Variables
8. Age −.22 −.13 −.30 −.03 −.17 −.33 −.19 33.7 (9.4)
9. IQ .01 .06 −.07 .14 −.02 −.09 −.03 .18 98.3 (14.4)
10. Education Level .09 .13 −.04 .29 −.02 .01 −.09 .27 .46 2.3 (1.1)
11. Income Level .05 .08 −.02 .15 −.04 −.09 .05 .03 .12 .22 2.6 (1.6)
12. Years Incarcerated .07 .06 .04 .18 −.06 −.02 .06 .39 .46 .26 −.02 4.8 (6.2)
13. No. Times Incarcerated .08 .02 .11 .01 .05 .06 .12 .43 −.25 −.07 −.10 −.18 2.1 (1.7)
14. Prison Security Level .16 .14 .18 .05 .19 .02 .29 −.12 .19 .10 −.01 .29 .19 2.5 (0.7)
15. BIDR IM Scale −.20 −.10 −.28 −.08 −.08 −.21 −.27 .14 .10 .12 .13 .09 −.10 −.03 63.9 (17.1)
16. STAI Trait Anxiety −.06 −.11 .01 −.07 −.12 .09 −.06 .18 .10 .19 −.11 −.05 .09 −.07 .08 37.0 (11.3)
Dependent Variable
17. Kendall’s tau −.05 .09 −.20 .21 −.04 −.14 −.22 .30 .55 .37 .13 .35 −.17 .01 .11 −.06 0.74 (0.36)

Note: n = 100. Correlations in bold significant at p<.05;

= p≤ .08. Kendall’s tau was inverse logit transformed before calculating the reported correlations. The mean and standard deviation of Kendall’s tau in the table reflects the logit transformed variable; as reported in the text, the mean and standard deviation of the non-transformed variable was 0.81 (SD=.11), with a range from 0.47–0.99. PCL-R=Psychopathy Checklist Revised; BIDR IM = Balanced Inventory of Desired Responding Impression Management; STAI=Spielberger State Trait Anxiety Scale.