Table 3.
Evidence for effects of Yo Puedo at six-months on behaviors associated with sexual health outcomes Yo Puedo Feasibility Study, 2011–2012
Intent to Treata N=162 |
Per-Protocolb | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
OR | p-value | ORc | p-value | |
Friend Risk Profile | ||||
Close friends gang affiliated | 0.71 | 0.31 | 0.40* | 0.10 |
Close friends detained | 0.60 | 0.12 | 0.37* | 0.09 |
Individual Behavior | ||||
Hangs out on the corner frequently | 0.54* | 0.10 | 0.46 | 0.15 |
Frequent alcohol use in past 6 months | 0.76 | 0.50 | 0.16* | 0.10 |
Frequently used marijuana in the past 6 months | 0.59 | 0.13 | 0.10** | 0.02 |
Any sex in the past 6 months | 0.50** | 0.04 | 0.57 | 0.35 |
Unprotected sex at last sex | 0.42 | 0.12 | 0.24 | 0.21 |
Contraceptive efficacy and motivation (continuous) (β) | −0.13* | 0.07 | −0.03 | 0.75 |
Reproductive Health Service Use | ||||
Accessed reproductive health services in the past 6 months | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.92 | 0.21 |
Enrolled in Family PACT | 0.69 | 0.31 | 1.74 | 0.53 |
STI test in past 6 months | 0.80 | 0.58 | 1.43 | 0.61 |
p≤0.1;
p≤0.05.
ITT: Intervention N=79; Control N=83.
Per-Protocol: Adherent (attended 3+ sessions and received at least one CCT payment) N=31; Control N=83.
Effect estimates adjusted for baseline level of the outcome examined and, in all models, baseline covariates that differed significantly between adherent and control participants, including: high-risk close (gang involved or detained within past 6 months); frequent substance use (marijuana and/or alcohol at least weekly); and attended middle school in the U.S.