Table 1.
Results from analysis of training-related modulation of activity during choices of low value items on Train Low pairs (p < .05, corrected); regions presented here demonstrated negative relationship with the proportion of choices of the low value items on Train Low pairs across the 10 runs. For each cluster, the list shows all regions from the Harvard-Oxford atlas that contained more than 10 voxels within that cluster, along with the peak X/Y/Z location for the cluster in MNI space.
Train Low Chose Low
| |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
cluster | region | # voxels in region | Cluster size | X | Y | Z | Peak Z |
1 | L Superior Parietal Lobule | 465 | 3039 | 12 | −66 | 56 | 4.23 |
R Superior Lateral Occipital Cortex | 455 | ||||||
LSuperior Lateral Occipital Cortex | 437 | ||||||
R Precuneus Cortex | 373 | ||||||
R Superior Parietal Lobule | 353 | ||||||
L Postcentral Gyrus | 115 | ||||||
R Postcentral Gyrus | 102 | ||||||
R Angular Gyrus | 81 | ||||||
R Posterior Supramarginal Gyrus | 59 | ||||||
L Posterior Supramarginal Gyrus | 56 | ||||||
L Anterior Supramarginal Gyrus | 44 | ||||||
L Precuneus Cortex | 40 | ||||||
| |||||||
2 | L Inferior Lateral Occipital Cortex | 549 | 1068 | −46 | −74 | −8 | 3.97 |
L Occipital Fusiform Gyrus | 210 | ||||||
L Temporal Occipital Fusiform Cortex | 92 | ||||||
L Temporooccipital ITG | 37 | ||||||
| |||||||
3 | R Middle Frontal Gyrus | 453 | 713 | 52 | 18 | 32 | 3.75 |
R Precentral Gyrus | 52 | ||||||
R IFG, pars opercularis | 27 | ||||||
R IFG, pars triangularis | 16 | ||||||
R Frontal Pole | 15 | ||||||
| |||||||
4 | R Inferior Lateral Occipital Cortex | 292 | 494 | 42 | −68 | −16 | 3.66 |
R Temporooccipital ITG | 98 | ||||||
R Occipital Fusiform Gyrus | 28 | ||||||
R Temporal Occipital Fusiform Cortex | 14 | ||||||
| |||||||
5 | L Middle Frontal Gyrus | 265 | 393 | −44 | 28 | 28 | 3.87 |
L Precentral Gyrus | 37 | ||||||
L IFG, pars opercularis | 11 | ||||||
L IFG, pars triangularis | 10 |