Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Community Psychol. 2014 Jan;42(1):61–79. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21594

Table 3.

T-tests between and within 38 Boston neighborhoods; Testing change in collective efficacy for families 2006 to 2010

3a. Between Neighborhoods Paired t-test; N=38

Mean (SD)
2006 2010 t p-value p
−.13(.42) −.02(.37) −2.15 0.04 *
3b. Within Neighborhoods t-test; N=5125, stratified by neighborhood

Without Bonferroni With Bonferroni
# % p-value # % p-value
significant tests (of 38) significant tests significant tests (of 38) significant tests
3 8% 0.05 0.00 0% 0.001
#

p<.10

*

p<.05

**

p<.01

***

p<.001

Bonferroni correction is .05 divided by the number of tests; for each neighborhood cluster (n=38) we are testing one outcome for 38 neighborhoods, so .05 is divided by 38.

NOTES: The sample size for section 3a is 38, because the t-tests are done using neighborhood level data; the sample size for section 3b is 5125, because the t-tests are done at the individual level, but stratified by neighborhood -- the neighborhood specific sample sizes range from 4 to 203 cases.