Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun 5;5:21. doi: 10.1186/2041-9139-5-21

Table 4.

ANCOVA for canal diameter and neuromast size in the SO and MD canals combined in Tramitichromis and Aulonocara

  N R 2 F d.f. P -value
Canal diameter ( Tramitichromis )
175
0.67
 
 
 
SL
 
 
348.0619
1, 171
<.0001
Canal
 
 
5.0408
1, 171
0.026
SL x Canal
 
 
0.3324
1, 171
0.5650
Canal diameter ( Aulonocara )
183
0.77
 
 
 
SL
 
 
582.8945
1, 179
<.0001
Canal
 
 
5.708
1, 179
0.0179
SL x Canal
 
 
3.1312
1, 179
0.0785
 
N
R 2
F
d.f.
P -value
Neuromast length ( Tramitichromis )
180
0.74
 
 
 
SL
 
 
338.8333
1, 176
<.0001
Canal
 
 
149.0871
1, 176
<.0001
SL x Canal
 
 
0.3759
1, 176
0.5406
Neuromast length ( Aulonocara )
209
0.73
 
 
 
SL
 
 
487.6754
1, 205
<.0001
Canal
 
 
54.3751
1, 205
<.0001
SL x Canal
 
 
2.4841
1, 205
0.1165
 
N
R 2
F
d.f.
P -value
Neuromast width ( Tramitichromis )
180
0.89
 
 
 
SL
 
 
1362.844
1, 176
<.0001
Canal
 
 
76.2438
1, 176
<.0001
SL x Canal
 
 
0.2324
1, 176
0.6304
Neuromast width ( Aulonocara )
209
0.88
 
 
 
SL
 
 
1441.915
1, 205
<.0001
Canal
 
 
16.9214
1, 205
<.0001
SL x Canal     0.4012 1, 205 0.5272

Analysis was carried out for supraorbital (SO) and mandibular (MD) canals combined in Tramitichromis and in Aulonocara. SL = Standard length (fish size) in mm. All data were normally distributed. Significance = P <0.05. The interaction terms in these ANCOVAs were significant, so the Johnson-Neyman technique was not used. See Figure 12 and Table 2 for ANOVA results and individual regressions.