Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jun 23.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Genet. 2013 Mar 12;14(4):262–274. doi: 10.1038/nrg3425

Table 1.

Summary of organismal examples of selection at linked sites.*

organism genome-scale analysisa SLS inferencea
neutral polymorphism correlated withb:
recombination rate correlated withb:
key references
strength RHH BGS rec. rate repl. site divergence gene density codon bias site freq. spectrum repl. site divergence neutral site divergence
Mammals

Homo sapiens + moderate (+) + + + o + 23, 24, 31, 134, 147, 148

Mus musculus + o 149, 150
Birds

Gallus gallus + o o 151, 152

Insects

Anopheles gambiae + + (+) 153

Drosophila melanogaster + strong + + + + + + o 6, 10, 29, 39, 40, 49, 154156

Drosophila persimilis + + o 132

Drosophila pseudoobscura + moderate (+) + o o(+) 106, 135, 157

Drosophila simulans + strong + + (+) 30, 47

Nematodes

Caenorhabditis briggsae strong + + (+) (+) 59

Caenorhabditis elegans + strong + + + o + (+) o(+) 62, 63, 158, 159

Caenorhabditis remanei o (o) 160

Fungi

Saccharomyces cerevisiae + weak + (+) (+) o (−) (−) 56, 137, 161164

Plants
Aegilops spp. + 165

Arabidopsis thaliana + weak + o(+) o o o o 32, 55, 166168

Arabidopsis lyrata weak o o o o o 54, 167

Beta vulgaris + o 169

Lycopersicon spp. weak + o(+) o 53, 116, 170, 171

Medicago truncatula + + + 172

Oryza sativa weak + + + 36, 173

Oryza rufipogon moderate + o/− + 36

Zea mays weak + o(+) o o 57, 174, 175
*

studies of non-recombining chromosomes not included;

a

a ‘+’ indicates affirmative evidence, ‘−’ indicates refuting evidence;

b

a ‘+’ indicates positive correlation, ‘−’ indicates negative correlation, ‘o’ indicates no correlation; values in parenthesis indicate weak or marginally-significant effect; RHH = recurrent genetic hitchhiking; BGS = background selection